The Tennis News Authority

Tennis News Authority Alive and Well Via Twitter! Follow us today!

2010-10-24T09:51:00.000-04:00

Twitter Follow: TennisAuthority

Twitter...The ultimate real-time pulse of the world. Millions of tweets pumping through cyber-space a minute on everything from movie-stars, to current events, sports and the complete random.

Well, with the Tennis News Authority in semi-retirement, I've been keeping up the twitter account fairly regularly (almost daily) with various musings relating to tennis. Just about 250 followers and new ones each day it's been a fun alternative to blogging. Twitter is a great parking lot for the TennisAuthority. I can continue to share my tennis thoughts, without having to (quite frankly) put in the time to write something with a bit more meat.

Come join us on Twitter today! Follow: TennisAuthority

Cheers!
MarkOskar

The Tennis News Authority Shutting its Virtual Doors

2010-05-13T18:52:00.002-04:00

I've tried to inspire myself to continue writing about the sport I continue to love and play, and enjoy, but not even a resurgant Ernests Gulbis could keep me writing (he won today by the way)...

After about a year, 200 posts, 5-figure hits, and thousands more on my little Youtube video, I simply don't have the urge to write about tennis. Perhaps I'll find real inspiration again come the French Open, but for now, these doors are closed.

It's been fun, relaxing, and a great learning experience writing this blog.
I will keep the site itself up, keeping the door slightly open to a post-retirement comeback (ala Clijsters), so feel free to read through past posts, comment, or remove this blog from your bookmark.

Best Regards to you all!
Mark Oskar

Gulbis to Challenge Nadal in Rome

2010-04-30T19:14:00.004-04:00

Well, I'm excited as I've been in some time about tennis. Sure it's in my blood, once breathing it hours a day...but as you get older and adult life kicks in, passions can sometimes become fleeting.
But I have found new excitement. The intercounty league tennis season starts shortly, the weather is great (in Toronto), and my one-time pick of the "new generation" is finally making some tracks. Ernests Gulbis, the lanky but big Latvian with a power game that sicken even the most deft defensive players. Unfortunately, the Gulbis ascent hasn't quite happened as most expected. He has struggled horribly over the last many (many) months. From tough draws, to poor tennis, including a mental struggle that is brought about generally by a lack of confidence, and pure imaturity.

His victory against Federer could be a turn though. It's the kind of victory that can give a young player the confidence to start really moving forward.

So he plays Nadal now. What's the scoop here? Gulbis may just get romped out there. Set-back? No, not at all. The Latvian needs wins, he needs to get deep in some draws, and he needs to walk before he can run. I'd be horribly surprised if he manages to over-power Nadal on clay...It's clay! When healthy, there is no greater magician on the durt than the Spaniard. If Gulbis starts slow, it'll be over quickly folks.

I like this result though for Gulbis. It's money, points, and a tournament taking out a big big gun (Federer).

Grass season comes quickly, and this is what Gulbis should realistically be trying to work toward. Win some rounds, get your ranking back to where it should be, and start turning heads on the fast stuff.

I will be glued to the TV tomorrow watching this one.
Enjoy the tennis!

MarkOskar

Gulbis Powers through Federer at the Rome Masters

2010-04-27T19:22:00.002-04:00

I clearly have nearly been left for blogging dead, but perhaps I've found enough inspiration through one match to re-join the league of random writers across the globe.

In a stunning upset at the Rome Masters, Mr.Gulbis, the big Latvian kid who I've critisized for some time for underachieving in epic proportions, takes out Roger Federer in the opening match of his clay season.

7-5 in the 3rd, and there we go. Gulbis finally has a HUGE win, and one that could possibly give the kid enough confidence to start charging (again). Folks, Gulbis is the real deal, make absolutely no mistake. Big serve, MONSTER ground strokes which can overpower the likes of Fernando or even Soderling if summoned on a good day...He can hit is flat and brutally heavy.
Relentless attacking.

I've called this kid a future top-5'er...months later as his confidence spiralled from poor showing after poor showing, I left him for top-50 wandering. What is he now? Who knows, it's one win, early in a tournament, and he's not going to turn heads this clay season...but it's still a big one which should go a long way in his (mental) development and could be reflected upon when grass/hard courts are being played on.

Not sure Federer was really Federer in this match, but I say, who cares. You show up...you take your lumps, and that's what took place for Mr.Roger.

I want to see Gulbis figure this all out. He's a headcase, can sorely lack confidence, not care, nearly tank, and worst of all, he sometimes forgets that there are other things possible in an on-court strategy then "Kill the ball".

It's all there though for Gulbis, the physical make-up, and the heavy weapons...Once the kid figures out true mental toughness, the sky is the limit (!)

Enjoy Rome folks!
Mark Oskar

Roger Federer and Andy Murray: 2010 Australian Open - Post-Match Ceremony

2010-02-01T18:21:00.002-05:00

I wanted to post this piece of 2010 Australian Open history because I thought it was a brief, but wonderful view into Andy's personality, and both combatants class. Roger is right, Andy is too good a player not to win a slam someday. Patience Murray, patience...

Roger Federer: Is 2010 THE Year?

2010-01-31T16:08:00.002-05:00

Wow. Where do we start today? The Swiss Magician, Roger Federer thoroughly ravaged Andy Murray to make what should have been a great duel, into a one-sided dumping of the other.
Excluding moment in the 3rd set tie-breaker, Murray was realistically never really in this thing. Roger was serving too well, hitting crisp groundies, and making few errors when it counted the most. Andy didn't play bad tennis here, he just couldn't bring any magic at critical points. Federer was simply too good. It's Roger's 16th slam and suddenly we can talk about Federer going for more, perhaps even doing what only Laver and Budge have been able to accomplish is their legendary careers, win all 4 slams in a calendar year.

So is it really possible in 2010? I never thought I'd say this, but this may actually be his best shot ever! With Nadal's knee issues, Federer's new-found ultra confidence, and a top-10 that may suddenly be feeling the pressure again, I genuinly like Roger's chances in 2010. His semi-final and final showing at the Australian Open was stellar tennis, scary tennis, vintage Roger.

If he can somehow manage to keep this up at the French, Wimby, and U.S. Open, it's a tall order for anyone to show this master up. Right now, this very moment, Roger simply has no peer. He is the greatest of all time, and the best player in the world at this moment.

The French Open is the wild-card of the remaining 3 slams. There are far too many questions with respects to the greatest clay-court player of all time (Rafa), but this has got to make the defending champions chest puff out that much more. Roger is the defending champion, and I suspect the Australian Open will make him feel like the man to truly beat, not Nadal. Some players like being the underdog, but Roger is most lethal when he is the king, the front-runner, and the man to beat.

This season could go down in history folks, and if so, perhaps Federer can finally take the title of Worlds Greatest Athlete too.

MarkOskar

Serena Queen of Melbourne, Bryans Win Doubles

2010-01-30T08:45:00.002-05:00

Serena Williams showed guts, drive, and some serious mental toughness against a hostile Aussi crowd to take the 1st slam of the season. 6-2 in the third served was the score in the 3rd, but that didn't quite tell the story. This match had swings of momentum that seemed to nearly leave Serena for dead at the end of the 2nd set when Henin appeared to completely take over the match. But Williams brought something back in the 3rd and at 4-2, breaking Henin once more, the nail in the coffin was driven.

This is a great showing for Serena, who's last slam was marred with extreme negativity with her verbal attack on a lines judge. She showed great poise today, played within herself, and played with class. I'm happy for Serena, despite my 2009 blog-attack on her for showing no class what-so-ever. She appeared more mature today though, and won the Australian with much deserve.

For the doubles final which I dubbed a "Dream Final", the U.S. pair of Bryan and Bryan took out Nestor and Zimonjic in 3 sets adding to their legacy of one of the great doubles pairs of all time. I unfortunately haven't had a chance to watch it (yet), but I imagine it was quality doubles tennis.

Congratulations to Serena!
Federer and Murray is right around the corner folks :) This should be good.

MarkOskar

Australian Open, Melbourne Weather: HOT

2010-01-29T18:42:00.003-05:00

For the Saturday final of Serena Williams and Justine Henin we are going to have a sunny afternoon at very warm 29c. For the men, it doesn't get any better, partly cloudy, but 31c.

It's going to be warm out there. How will this play out?
Give Henin the advantage on Saturday...and it's anybodies guess on the Men's side, however I'd probably give Federer the benefit of the doubt.

If you are in Melbourne, stay cool!
MarkOskar

Aussi Open Near Climax!

2010-01-29T17:56:00.002-05:00

The weekend is set with awesome matches ahead of us to finalize this edition of the Australian Open. I'm looking forward to the intriguing tilts on tap as they have the potential to be insta-classics, and talked about for months.

With Serena (and sister Venus) taking the Aussi doubles, the Williams clan is staged to have another ultra successful tournament. Serena is of course taking on Henin in only a few hours, and this could really set the table for a wonderful 2010 season. We have the best player in the world, playing the former best player and recent come-back'er. While Serena is pounding the hell out of the ball, the tiny Henin will be taking Serena's strikes and counter-punching with angle and intelligence. Serena is no dummy out there either though, and also has a mental fortitude, that is matched by few...Fortunately for Henin, she just happens to be one of those few. I find this match nearly impossible to call, IF Henin wasn't just coming back from retirement. It's Serena Williams folks, she really is the best out there, and I can't help but feel that this is Serena's to win or lose. The ball is in her court for this one.
I'm picking Serena in 2 sets, however tightly contested.

What makes super Saturday even better is the not often talked about Men's doubles clash of the titans. The #1 doubles team of the 2 Bryan brothers take on the #2 (and just as easily #1) doubles pair of Daniel Nestor and Nenad Zimonjic. Both teams worked well through the draw however I'm going with SIs John Werthium's pick of Nestor and Zimonjic for the title. Why? If these 4 doubles specialists were all without partners and I had a choice to pick any one of them...It's hands down Nestor. He is simply the best doubles player on the planet, and in my mind a hall of famer. He's looking good out there, and the duo together has been in sync, and difficult to break. Should it be televised (I really hope it is)...Sit back and enjoy it. When Nestor and Zimonjic are on top of their game, they are the best doubles team out there, and I think the Bryan's know it.

After all this we finally come down to a dream final, which may be a preview of other finals throughout the next 2 years. Andy Murray and Roger Federer. The Scotsman and the Legend. Will Murray break the 6,000 year old drought from his kingdom? Will Federer start creating real space between him and Mr.Sampras? While I have blogged about Federer's potential demise, I get the sense that Nadal's absence and issues actually makes Roger stronger, more confident and ultimately the "old Roger"...A beast on the tennis court with no equal. He destroyed Tsonga, I mean, really pulverized him. Tsonga didn't have a chance, and that's got to linger a bit in Murray's head. Murray on the other hand just took out Cilic, and that's no small task. Cilic is a "next one", and one day this kid will get his break-through, but Murray is too strong right now and full of his own confidence. Look at what he did to Rafael Nadal a few days ago! He was killing him, dictating points, and was clearly the alpha-male.

I like Murray a lot. He's got a ton to prove though, a weighty shoulder, and the inexperience of owning slams like Federer does. I believe that Federer will close this down in 4 sets, possibly even 3 sets...However, if this thing goes into a 5th, then it's a toss up. I'd almost even give Murray the nod if it goes the distance, I just don't think it will.

Excitement is building for the Australian Open final! Enjoy the tennis everyone!

MarkOskar

Semis are Set at the Australian Open

2010-01-27T20:02:00.003-05:00

Federer against Tsonga - Tsonga is looking good, and even more importantly confident out there. While Federer can breath a sigh of relief after beating the hottest player on tour, things definitely aren't going to get easier out there. I like Tsonga's chances to break-through, however still won't bet anything here. Federer in 4-5 to head into another slam final using brilliant strokes, patience, and quality serving.

Murray and Cilic - This is intriguing isn't it? Murray dominated Nadal before Rafa bowed out with his knee injury, and Cilic is primed for THE break-through that so many of us have been waiting for. Cilic is (or will be) a top-3 or 4 player, let's see if this is where he begins to break on through. Cilic in 5 hard fought sets, or Murray in 3-4 continuing his excellent play.

Williams and Li - Chinese Tennis is strong at the Aussi Open, and I couldn't be more happier. It's great for the sport in Asia, and who can argue with diversity. This is a global sport, let's celebrate it. Unfortunately, Serena doesn't and shouldn't give a hoot. Serena in 2. Seriously, she's going to overpower Li.

Henin and Zheng - My comical call a couple of posts ago was humorously picking Zheng through on the bottom side of the draw. Who knew that it would come true? While I'm hesitant on the call, this is where Henin's ride stops. I'm going with a gutsy win from the Chinese player. Zheng in 3 playing intelligent yet brave tennis.

Federer - Davydenko: Rumble in the Melbourne Jungle (?)

2010-01-26T17:59:00.003-05:00

Play resumes shortly at the Australian Open, and on tap we'll finally get to see Davydenko show his new found success against a good-looking Federer at a slam.
Davydenko has looked solid already in Melbourne, but this test will give us the true story of what is up with the Russian. Is his solid play of late a mirage? No. The guy has beaten all kinds of super-stars lately including Roger twice...but slam tennis and everything else are 2 very, very different things.

I am quite confident that Federer will do this in 3-4 sets, but it should be a heck of a fight. I'm simply not convinced yet that Davydenko is ready for such a prime-time. I'm not really even convinced that Davydenko will EVER be ready for such a prime-time. Don't get me wrong, he's a brilliant player, with solid strokes, athleticism, and a level head, but he doesn't have "it". "It" is impossible to describe, but you know it when you see it, and you know when it is absent.

I could be wrong here though, or, perhaps not having "it" is actually Davydenko's advantage. Impossible to hold the same mental fortitude over 3-5 sets as you'd need to fight Nadal, Novak, or Roddick.

We'll find out soon enough. Should be a fun battle.

MarkOskar

Nadal Dumped Amid Knee Woes

2010-01-26T17:46:00.002-05:00

Here we are again. Here we go again!
Nadal playing a motivated and extremely sharp Andy Murray bows out of the Australian Open amid a 3rd set thrashing down love three. I've posted multiple times in the past that this is almost it for the Spaniard, however after his latest loss (give all credit to Murray who was killing Nadal), Nadal's window of opportunity is closing at the pace I expected.

Again, Nadal's game doesn't allow for longevity, his game is too brash, physically demanding, and bone jarring. Save the French, I would be surprised if we see Rafa take any slam from here on in, unless something changes dramatically.

What could possibly change to allow Nadal's window to hold steady or even open?
Who knows...Federer suddenly decides to retire (along with Del Potro, Cilic, Murray, Novak, and even Roddick!)? Maybe Nadal takes a break from Tennis APPROPRIATE to the severity of his injury. He's never going to shake this, however he is clearly and officially damaged goods.

I feel for Rafa. Not only are his knees questionable, but he's also watching some of the other young guys simply pass him by. Andy Murray was beating Nadal by dictating the points, and controlling everything from tempo, to patterns of play across the court. Physically well Nadal, probably still wasn't going to win this one. Probably? No, cancel that...Nadal wasn't going to win this one.

Let's hope something, anything changes for Rafael Nadal, or else 2010 will fade quicker than James Blake's thoughts of week #2.

MarkOskar

16 Thoughts from the Australian Open Round of 16

2010-01-23T19:01:00.003-05:00

We are heading into week #2 at the 2010 Australian Open and what has developed out there is quite intriguing, no? The year 2010 is a cross-roads for many top players, its a year that (I believe) will usher in significant change, or at least give us a clear indication of what is about to be ushered. This years Aussi Open is no doubt, our first true glimpse into what we can expect over the remaining 11 months of Tennis goodness.

Let's weigh in on action thus far down under:

Roger is looking decent out there, getting better with time, however not perfect. While I think he should continue to handle a motivated Lleyton (who will be physically rested), you really have to worry about what lurks in the quarter finals...
Davydenko is simply the hottest player on the mens tour. He's got Verdasco to handle next, which could be quite a task for Davydenko in a major, however he'll continue is hot streak. He's running over people right now, which won't happen against a fighter like Verdasco, but seriously, is anyone going to bet against him right now, at this stage?
Djokovic is quietly running through the draw and the heat isn't killing him. His round of 16 match is (on paper) the most lopsided affair out there. He's on a collision course with Tsonga, but that's not last stop for the Djoker-express.
Roddick is @#$^ around still? Of course he is and as he ages (still plenty young) it becomes more of a good thing. He's still the great American character out there, living by his monster serve and throwing f-bombs like its going out of style, but he's running into what could be the match of the round. Gonzalez is counter-heavy, fun, and with his contingent of fans. This is a big weighty affair that could be a gem, or could be a huge dud (in Roddick's favor). Edge - Roddick, however don't count Gonzalez out of this.
Andy, Andy, Andy...The second slider that no one is really talking about here...Or if they are, it's about how quietly he's running through the draw ala Novak. I haven't had the pleasure of watching any of his matches yet (save some highlights) but I still don't see it for Andy. He has big-boy Isner which is trouble, but Andy bright enough to be patient through this match and pick the spots...However it's then Nadal, potentially Del Potro (or Roddick/Gonazalez) and it just seems like 2 many 2 much for the Scotsman. Andy has 1 last breath before adios.
I've been doing this entire list in draw order and somehow I managed to lose Del Potro and Cilic. Is that a sign? What's up with the big man Del Potro? He's played a lot of Tennis already, thanks to James Blake, hasn't looked stellar, thanks to the bagel handed to him by Mayer, but he moves on. September 2009 seems like eons ago when he took the U.S. Open crown...And he's not in that "space" right now. Del Potro will bring it all together soon, but it's not major material. Dude, Blake is semi-washed up.
This leaves us with (yes, I'm ignoring Cilic's match) with Nadal! Rafffffaaaa! You crazy Spaniard! Here you are, fighting again, fist pumping, and all this jazzy stuff. Are your knees REALLY ok? Where is your head? Where are other peoples head against you? Do the elite players fear you right now? We'll find out.
The "We'll find out" is what is so wonderful about this years 2010 Australian Open. There are 10,000 additional questions to be asked about the players remaining on the mens side, all quite intriguing. Tsonga was hot against Haas...Hewitt is well rested for Roger...Is Roger REALLY looking like old Roger?...etc...etc...
The women are interesting as well, however I'm saddened with how the draw played out. Sure Clijsters sucked it up in her embarassing loss, but to me, everyone that matters is on the top half of the draw! Why? Venus, Serena, and the Great Dane. Yeah yeah yeah...Henin, Safina, that other Russian kid, the 2 other Russians duking it out....You know what? The hell with Henin and the Russians. I want Zheng to pull some of her Wimby magic of 2008 out, and make the Asian Tennis break-through that would be dramatic for Tennis.
Serena has lost 9 games thus far...
John Werthium, good on you for your Nestor/Zimonjic doubles call, but your timing is odd?
I officially will NEVER, EVER spend any time on Gulbis again. This is it! For a guy who has virtually all of the tools to win majors, haul points, and bring (more) character to the sport, he has really blown things huge.
High of 25c in Melbourne today. This is great. There is nothing worse than playing highly competitive Tennis in a sauna.
'member when Del Potro clobbered Nadal 2-2-2 at the U.S. Open? This has no point...but there are a lot of tall players on the south half of the draw who negate the heavy top-spin that Rafa loves.
It's my first post in months....I have nothing left for #15 ;) Give me a break!
Yep, it's good to be writing again!

The Tennis News Authority Returns!

2010-01-23T18:55:00.003-05:00

Well, it's been a while since my last blog post was published.
Where did I go? Well, December was a busy month personally and professionally, the holiday season kicked in, and January hasn't been much quieter for the household.
It's nice to sit down though (finally) and start thinking about the Tennis season already in full swing with its first major being played out. The round of 16 is upon us, and from both the men and the women, there is plenty to talk about.

I won't likely be able to return to 20+ posts a month, however I will try to at least keep this place active and full of thought. Let's see how it goes!

MarkOskar

Nadal: Done

2009-11-27T22:24:00.002-05:00

...At least for 2009 he is done. Rafa Nadal, who with less then a year ago was sitting on top of the tennis world with a French, Wimby, and Aussi open to his name. Now lies with an Aussi crown and barely a pulse. No it's not the end for the Spaniard who has rocked the tennis world for years with his brash play, mental touchness, and heavy top-spin forehands...but the end is nigh folks.

I've always contended that Rafa's style of play on court limits his ability to have a Federer-like career. He runs down too many balls, he plays too many long points, and he swings with such awkard and ridiculous top-spin force...It's simply not sustainable for a lengthy period of time.

This isn't the nail in the coffin, but what we know as triumphant Rafa, has peaked.

His play in London has been seriously diminished, and we can talk all day about what is really behind his problems: Bad knnes, family issues, lack of confidence, bad timing, and resurgant tennis elite foes...but those problems in tennis tend to mushroom. You see, tennis isn't a sport where you can so easily just regroup, forget about yesterday, and move on. Only a very few are capable of this. When Rafa junks it all out in London, not even taking a set against the group, it's going to weigh on him...and more importantly, it's going to give his opponents more than enough confidence the next time out.

Mike Tyson was never the same after Douglas surprised him for the knock out.

This is more TKO style, but you can bet on Nadal dropping out semi-finals or earlier in Australia, and perhaps continuing this difficult tennis for some time. Does he recover? I hope so. We all hope so. He's good for the game, he's the anti-Federer, and the dynamic Roger-Rafa match-up is simply the best one-on-one fight of all time. I except and hope we see some Rafa of old in time for the French, but as I've said before, his game is built off of impossible will, and physical force.

I genuinly sense the sunset of both Roger and Rafa in 2010 (as #1 & 2), if they are heading to a city near you, go out and watch them while they still have pace, and genius.

MarkOskar.

Nadal Out, Soderling Impresses (again)

2009-11-25T19:30:00.005-05:00

Nadal's season is officially toast, and it's looking more and more like the talented Spaniard hasn't quite bottomed out yet. After a thorough dismantling performed by Davydenko in London, Rafa is out of the year-end tournament, and has suffered two fairly significant losses in one tournament.

The 6-1, 7-6 (4) loss exits Nadal from contention, and worse, gives him two losses two players not named: Federer, Djokovic, Murray, or Del Potro. Sure Robin Soderling is making some serious use of his last minute entry into the ATP World Tour Finals, but Davydenko? Perhaps I'm not giving Davydenko enough credit here. The guy shows up, quietly plays efficient ball and hangs his hat up no matter what the outcome. I'm worried about Nadal, he really, truly hasn't appeared the same since just prior to the French, and things aren't bottoming out (yet). Where does this horrible showing leave the lad? The Australian Open is really not that far out, and he has a slam title to defend there. At this point, you can quite confidently say that Nadal isn't even a top-3 contender for the title down under. I've written about his fading and already small window of opportunity left in his career, but this is getting out of control. Rest up Rafa, get away from the sport, and find your soul.

While one star fades, another star is born (again) in Robin Soderling. The semi-destruction of Nadal, and then topping the hottest player on tour (Djokovic) in a significant tournament is big, big stuff for the Swede. What I question is, can Soderling keep this up beyond a tournament structure, surface, and environment (indoor) that is simply tailored perfectly to his game?

We all know he's streaky and the "big game" player, throwing huge serves and brutal forehands around the court which, when on, are tough to compete against. When on, he can kill you physically and mentally...and then he'll "Yoke" with you afterward! I like the guy, he's great for the game, Swedish tennis, and Nadal-haters. Now with a confirmed semi-final berth in London, he's got 'em right where he wants 'em. No one will want to play Soderling, and he surely must feel that.

I would love to now see a Federer-Soderling final in which perhaps, just maybe, Soderling can end his 0'fer streak of futility against the Swiss Giant.

This isn't getting good, this is getting awesome folks.

MarkOskar

Robin Soderling: The Yoke-man

2009-11-23T18:40:00.002-05:00

In celebration of the Swede's victory today against Rafael Nadal. Let's sit back, grab a beer, and have a good "Yoke"!

Robin Soderling Vikings Rafa Nadal

2009-11-23T18:29:00.003-05:00

6-4, 6-4 was the final score as Soderling triumphantly shook the Spaniards hands.
There is was, quick and (relatively) easy, Soderling follows up that magical afternoon in Paris with another defeat of the #2 player in the world.

I thought this was going to happen. Streaky, big game hitter indoors, against a struggling player.
Soderling was primed for this round robin victory, however 1 match doesn't get you out of the woods just yet.

With that victory though, Soderling instantly "belongs" here in London, and Nadal's confidence should be very questionable. I like Robin in this tournament, more so than I would like a healthy Roddick, who he replaced. He certainly has something to prove, it's a surface tailored to the big viking, and I suspected that this first match against Nadal was exactly what he needed.

With Murray, Federer, and Djokovic (in progress at time of writing) playing 3-set matches, how did Soderling become the guy pocketing the easiest opening match? It looks good for Soderling, but he's got a tough grouping.

Djokovic is still the hottest player by far out there, and he is more than a capable indoor foe.

Enjoy the matches!
MarkOskar

Tennis World Tour Finals: Is Djokovic the Man to Beat?

2009-11-21T11:02:00.004-05:00

With the big Serbian playing some serious ball to finish the season, the year ending World Tour Finals played in London looks more and more intriguing by the minute. Novak Djokovic is beating everyone in sight, all challenges are on the table, and he'll stare you down at every opportunity.

For a guy that hasn't won a slam since the Aussi Open in 2008, how has he suddenly become the big dog on the block? Well, Novak really, truly hasn't gone anywhere folks. He sits in the #3 spot, closing the gap and within reach of the #1 ranking. He's captured 5 titles in 2009, including Basel over Federer, and France (Masters) eliminating Soderling, Nadal, and Monfils in the finals. This guy is hot right now, very hot.

It's an interesting time to peak. While Nadal struggles, and Federer too busy changing diapers, Novak is not-so-quietly asserting himself as the true #3, and 2010 can tell us if he's the real deal for a #1-2 spot. London will give us quite a bit to talk about. With the two groups of ultra-super tennis stars wonderfully sorted, this could be a lot of fun.

Group A consists of:

Roger Federer, Andy Murray, Fernando Verdasco, and Juan Martin del Potro.

Group B consists of:

Rafael Nadal, Novak Djokovic, Nikolay Davydenko, and Robin Soderling.

Group A is interesting, but for some of the wrong reasons. Del Potro hasn't really done anything since his magical run in New York. Federer appears to be struggling to finish the season (but never count him out), Verdasco continues to play his rank, and Murray...Well he lost to Stepanek in France, but won in Spain the week before (Verdasco being his only win of real note).

Who do you pick out of Group A? This is tough, I'll pick Federer topping Murray, only because The Fed is a master at peaking when he needs to.

Group B is far more interesting (to me) than Group A. Nadal is struggling badly, body and mind don't appear to be what they should be. Excuses continue to fly from the Spaniard, and I just don't see him pulling this out. Why? Novak is far too hot to Nadal to handle, and with Djokovic's impressive indoor record, the fast indoor flight will kill Rafa. In fact, Soderling has a much better shot here than Rafa based on surface and the indoor environment. I like the Andy Roddick replacement here. He's had a great break-out season, he has an opportunity to haul some cash and keep asserting himself as someone that belongs with the elite. Big game + Indoor = Dark, dark horse. Look for Soderling/Nadal to be a fun match-up. No need to explain, we all know the history here. While we talk about these big players, Davydenko will quietly play his usual blue-collar workman tennis. He won't win the thing, but he could ruffle feathers.

Novak Djokovic will be king here, but watch Soderling, never take your eye off these streaky, big game players.

With Djokovic and Federer going deep, this continues to be the defending champions (Novak) tournament. Look for Djokovic to take the title, and head into 2010 with huge (huge) momentum. If he pulls this out, Australia could make for one helluva slam.

With younger, faster, stronger, bigger players on the horizon, and a hot Serbian...Could 2010 be the year Federer and Nadal relinquish #1 and #2?

Sit back folks, the few months are going to be very interesting.

MarkOskar

Djokovic Plays Special to Take the Swiss Indoors

2009-11-08T15:10:00.003-05:00

After taking the first set 6-4 against the mighty Federer, Djokovic looked primed to pull the upset off in Federer's home town. Federer however shined in the 2nd (4-6), and then appeared to just semi-fall apart in the third set (6-2). Was it Federer's mistakes as he noted post-match, or was it Djokovic's quality play?

Let's assume both, however let's give Djokovic's play a bit more credit. He was sticking it to Federer at times, and keeping the pressure on, enough to make Roger hit enough "unforced" errors.

Said Djokovic, ""I have to produce something special to win,"..."I think I played one of the best matches of the year...".

Yep, no doubt about it. Novak certainly has a big win under his belt, which should set him up well in London at the Barclay's "Big Money Extravaganza!". He is the defending champion, and will have us talking in London for sure.

As for Federer, surely it's a let-down to lose in front of your home town fans, but this really means nothing. At this point, it's Slam tennis here on in for the Swiss star. Win majors, show your face otherwise and compete. It's odd to say this, but the Aussi Open is not really that far off. Rest up Roger, and run deep down under.

MarkOskar

Federer Playing Solid in Basel

2009-11-08T10:10:00.004-05:00

Federer is rolling in his home town Basel tournament. The Swiss Indoors will have Djokovic take on Federer for the crown. Federer holding a 9-4, win-loss against Novak should have a significant advantage this afternoon. Home crowd support. Does he need it this week? Maybe not...In 4 matches thus far, Federer hasn't lost a set, and far more impressively...Hasn't even lost his serve!

Federer in two tight sets this afternoon.

Enjoy!
MarkOskar

Tommy Haas Dealing with Swine Flu

2009-11-03T16:55:00.003-05:00

Tommy Haas has been tested positive for Swine Flu, and that is certainly (to me) no shock as we enter into the flu season across the northern hemisphere. H1N1 (Swine Flu), is the dominant strain in North America, and in Europe, so if you catch the flu...You very likely have H1N1. I find it still interesting that the media and public haven't seem to catch on to that. Seasonal H1N1 is barely in existence in those above mentioned places, and we really won't be seeing much of it in the near term at all.

All the best to Tommy on a speedy recovery, a good rest, and continuation of his great play.

MarkOskar

Andre Agassi & Steffi Graf: Some Insight into Life After Tennis

2009-11-01T12:03:00.004-05:00

After the headline news about Andre's dabble into Crystal Meth many years ago as he discusses in his new autobiography, I decided to look at Andre's life through Youtube's eyes and came across a great piece by the BBC that interviews Steffi and Andre together. It's a great interview that provides insight into their lives, how they've matured beyond tennis, and provides a glimpse into what really is important in their life today. Have a watch, and enjoy.

Part 1 of 3:

Part 2 of 3:

Part 3 of 3:

Andre Agassi: What Now?

2009-10-30T19:04:00.004-04:00

Andre Agassi, the multi-slam winner, the career slam winner, the American legend, who has given more back to charity than many of the worlds top athletes combined, has admitted to mid-career usage of drugs. Sex, drugs, and Rock'n'Roll Tennis was clearly alive back in the day, and Andre was apparently leading the charge.

While the story is already a few days old, I avoided a quick post, so I could reflect on what something like this means to tennis and to Andre. He's one of the greatest of all time, most would consider him a true role-model in a time where sports role-models are nearly impossible to find. His charity work is already legendary, bringin millions of dollars to those in need, and in need of education.

I was never a true Agassi fan, but as his career wore on, I admired his maturation on and off the court, his longevity, and commitment to tennis, and of course his charity work. Andre appeared to really grow into something special off the court. To top it off, he married someone who I WAS a real fan of, Steffi Graf. In my mind, the greatest female athlete of all time, and owner of the most dominant forehand (male or female) ever. Is the admiration and respect for Agassi fallen off of the map? Honestly, I am not sure.

Andre admits to a difficult father, an overbearing father, but often character is born out of adverse/unique situations that Andre describes. That's really no excuse however. His actions undermined the credibility of his chosen sport, and was dishonest to his millions of fans around the globe. It's truly a shame, but is Andre now the person that he was well over a decade ago? Absolutely not. Does that change things though? Not really.

So Andre isn't that person that he once was (a manipulative, apparently out of control, lier). We believe his life has turned around completely for the better. He has a positive affect on thousands of people who receive a direct benefit from his charitable work, which is now a significant operation. But so what? What's the difference? While he's admitted to wrong-doing, he hasn't or likely will not receive any consequences what-so-ever. Well now, what about Martina Hingis? Should Andre be "Banned" from the sport for a period of time? What the hell will that do? Nothing.

I don't believe Andre's legacy will be really tarnished because a) he's not taking performance enhancing drugs; b) this was a while ago, and somehow that always seems to diminish the action; and c) he is genuinly a good (great) person now. With all that being said however, I still think the International Tennis Federation should respond appropriately, and consistent with how they normally respond to these scenarios. It'll be a pointless disciplinary action, but consistency is good.

So where does this leave us? It leaves us with a player who clearly was not, and is not perfect, who has changed his life for the (much) better, but still may have a price to pay for his actions.
I feel for Andre, but I'm not sorry for him. Nor am I sorry for what (if any) negative impact comes to his legacy because of this. I don't say that with malice, it just is what it is. Do bad stuff, pay the price. There simply isn't enough ownership/responsibility anymore for ones actions, and who it is (a tennis legend) should have absolutely nothing to do with it. Nothing.

This also leaves us with a sport that is fighting an increasing amound of fires that it shouldn't have to. As my last post stated, "Tennis the Good" is dead. Coke-boys, Crystal meth issues, performance enhacing druggies, the whole betting thing, freaks (Serena) who apparently have zero self-control...It's all there, all recent, and all creating a sport with a dark underbelly.

I hope this crap is absent from the 2010 season, but I'm begining to think that what 2009 brought us, is just the tip of the... "ICEBERG RIGHT AHEAD!"

Tennis: 2009 Professional Season in Review

2009-10-28T18:22:00.004-04:00

I apologize for the lack of posts lately however it's a busy time, mostly from a career perspective.

While the 2009 season continues on, many casual fans have tuned out and turned to various other sports (Basketball, Hockey, Football, European Football) to carry them through into the winter. No, the season isn't done, but I can safely make an assumption that the big stories have played out, and we can look forward to 2010, while watching the pulse of the 2009 season come to an end. It's been an inspiring year for the yellow ball, a strange year, and also one of frustration. Let's take a look at some of those stories that entered into our collective racquet wielding minds (in no particular order).

Federer wins French/Wimbledon - When so many were beginning to count Roger out on account of fresher, younger legs out there...Roger inspired us at Rolland Garros, and had us at the edge of our seats winning his 15th slam at Wimbledon. He claimed tennis immortality in 2009, yet can surely bring in a few more before he hangs up his sneakers.
Any notion of "Tennis the Good" is officially history - From tennis legends admitting to Crystal Meth. use (Andre Agassi), French kissing Cocaine heads, mind boggling complete losses of control on the tennis court, to the never ending sports (tennis) betting issues. 2009 brought these issues into the light and for those who think those athletes who find any string of innocence to hold onto are completely innocent, I say "Wake UP!". There is a dark underbelly to many of the athletes, and the environments that they associate with outside of the tennis court.
The return of...(enter female athletes name here) - Henin, Clijsters, Sabatini...Ok, Gabriella isn't coming back, much to my dismay...But there are 2 major athletes returning to the game which should hopefully spark the 2010 season on the women's side. It's needed, because I just don't see Safina/S.Williams "Who's #1?" storyline having a lot of staying power for very long.
The Next Generation is Here - Del Potro is leading the march to perform some serious shake-up among the kings of the tennis court, and I couldn't be happier. His unrelenting groundies, big serve, and character make him an excellent choice to one day take the thrown. There are so many others (Cilic...etc...) who can really follow Del Potro's lead into high ranks, and I can't wait for it to happen. Bring on the kids!
The Russian is Going, the Russian is Going! - Is it worthy of this list? Maybe not to most, but to me it is. I'm not alone in saying this, Marat Safin had as much, if not more raw tennis talent then Roger Federer. You don't have to agree with that statement, and quite frankly I don't care. His game, when matched with a focused head, was something to behold.
Dementieva - No cute title used here, and really she hasn't proven all that much in 2009, except I'm still big on her new found ability to not only match Serena physically on the court, but surpass and at times, completely dominate her. Imagine is she could also match Serena from a serving perspective? Wow. Dementieva has something to really build upon in 2010. I hope she meets this challenge.
The Schedule Sucks! - Yeah it does, it really, really stinks, but I disagree with Rafa and others on why the schedule stinks. The Australian Open is simply in the wrong spot, the lack of lead-up to it is pathetic, and tennis is hurt because of it. Everything beyond the U.S. Open is a barely an afterthought for the non-hardcore fan. Greater structure is needed, a more defined off season, and a ranking system that compliments the schedule/year better. When Nadal whines about his 20 tournaments played (or whatever it is), and then turns around and says "how much my friend?" to some exhibition organizer, I say "Suck it up bicep-boy!".
Andy Murray Will NEVER Win Wimbledon - Yep it's true. I don't wish it, but he's not the "Chosen One" to end the torment of our U.K. friends. His game is big, his fitness is excellent, but his timing to simply exist as a professional (it's not his fault) just isn't there. Murray is unfortunately held between the Federer era (and Nadal), and an even younger generation which will take hold shortly, and Murray will unfortunately sail into the night.
Gulbis Come Back (from your ranking dive) - Holy moly, he's barely in the top-100 now. For a guy that had so much promise, and such a monster of a game, he's fallen on extremely tough times, tough draws, and probably a complete lack of confidence. It's a shame, because this guys game is so huge that Soderling would look like a moon-baller out there. If anything could save Gulbis, it's a few good results, and a coach to teach his more than the speed - "Stupid fast". He'll make it back into the top-30 in 2010, I refuse to lose hope.
Coaching on the WTA Tour is Just Dumb - Our CNNSI friend touched on this just a few days ago, and he's right. Tennis has no place for on-court, mid-match coaching...It never has. It removes aspects of the game that make tennis great in the first place - The lone warrior, alone for hours except for the opponent directly in front of them, left to their devices to figure out how to win. There are few sports in the world that match this one-on-one aspect, and the WTA has completely ignored this. Sad.

This is surely just the tip of the iceberg, and 2009 was really a heck of a year in terms of quality of tennis, media attention (Good and Bad), and general momentum for the sport. All this while suffering through a global economy that remains shaky at best.

Tennis should be in good shape next year to captivate the hardcore fans, and continue bringing in new fans. I can't wait.

Cheers,
Mark Oskar

B*tching About the Tennis Season: Quit It!

2009-10-16T20:46:00.006-04:00

In the year 2009 we, as a society, complain about everything. We live in a world where quality of life is individually measured in how little we actually work to sustain a desired lifestyle. Many sit on our butts on a Sunday afternoon and whine about a quarterback who just isn't seeing that guy open all game long. It's a material world, a world of instant gratification, a world where sucking it up exists only within the old-school society. Our mentality has evolved to the point where anything accomplished is never enough, and yet working hard to accomplish anything is such a horrible task. Sustaining what you've accomplished, well now, how dare you put such a feat on me!

The above doesn't necessarily apply to all of our tennis friends, and the point the exaggerated to
make an obvious point. Our tennis stars need to quit their bitching, take a look at their own playing habits and look to the past for rule on how it can be done and successfully.

This is of course referring to the barrage of complaints over the strenuous and lengthy tour schedule. From Nadal, to Roddick, to Federer, to McEnroe, they all are quick to tell us that the players are "dying" out there. They are breaking down, burning out, and shortening their careers significantly.

What? Come again? Nadal is a poster boy for this speak, and yet the lad hasn't played twenty (20) tournaments since 2005! 2005! He's sat in and around nineteen (19) tournaments now for four (4) years! Federer? Oh geez, well, he reached that plateau the year prior, in 2004.

These guys aren't even remotely burning the midnight oil here, and they are making it out to be a life-and-death situation! What's worse here is that the two lads noted have agreed to play the Abu Dhabi exhibition off-season. This of course isn't the only exhibition they'll be playing over the course of the next fourteen (14) months, but it's the most recently noted in the news.

It's just an exhibition MarkOskar! What harm can this do? Considering the optics of this is something that clearly Uncle Toni and Rafa have considered. When you bitch and complain about the length of the season, the harm done to your body, and the shortening of your career, you better not be turning your head licking your fingers and taking a wad of cash to play some meaningless fun-show. The professional tour is after all what made these players millionaire-super-stars, not the Abi Dhabi show.

Could the season have a better defined and lengthier off-season? Yes. Does this require fewer meaningful events spread across the season? No, absolutely not. The season could surely be improved upon. I think it ludicrous that the Aussi Open is played so early in the season, with barely any time for the athletes to get back into the swing of things. However averaging nineteen (19) tournaments a year over the past few years is hardly what is killing Rafa.

To illustrate the point further let's take a look at something I wrote about Rod Laver back in April of this year:

"In 1967, Rod Laver won 19 tournaments, or as many tournaments as Roger Federer played in the year 2008. 2 years later, the undersized Australian went on to sweep the majors for a 2nd time (the only man to ever accomplish this) and add another 14 titles to his growing haul. In that same year Laver took 18 of 32 tournaments entered. To re-iterate, the legend already at the top of the tennis world, played 32 singles tournaments.

In fact, from 1961 through 1970, Laver averaged a little over 15 tournaments won. An absolutely remarkable feat. Federer averaged 19 tournaments played 1999 through the 2008 season, with his earlier pre-dominant years keeping the average well up as he looked for needed ranking points. This is striking as there is gaining momentum for the tennis bodies to shrink the season with players breaking down everywhere. Apparently they just don't make them like they used to."

Seriously, they don't make 'em like they used to, which is why I continue to believe that Rod Laver is simply the Greatest of All Time.

So why is it that players are complaining so much these days? The bandwagon is clearly rolling with some high impact voices on board. Here are a few ideas:

1) The game and players have changed - What Rod experienced and what Rafa experiences are two very different things. The game today is faster, stronger, and more physical. The players today are faster, stronger, and more physical. Unfortunately, I'm not sure that truly holds in Rafa's court. Points were longer back in the day, equipment (shoes) were less advanced, and bodies were not nearly in the condition that peak athletes are today. Racquets of today require far less power to get a heavy ball rolling, and it's significantly easier to utilize an opponents pace.
2) All injuries need a scapegoat - Yep, and this is it. It has nothing to do with the activity off the tour, the excessive style utilized on court, or anything else. Pick the easiest target and go with it.
3) Tipping Points and Mob Mentality - Started with a single voice, turned to a few, and momentum was gained. The few became many, and the trend was alive. It's alive!!!

There's more, but that's probably enough fort his post.

So what was acceptable in the past isn't acceptable today. We have athletes who screw around with off-tour exhibitions like it's going out of style for big money, and media apologists turn the blind eye. Players who aren't even really grinding it out big time over the course of the year are crying like they just played 52 weeks of tournaments straight.

I have no sympathy for any of these guys until they make some changes in their off-season activities and then take a look at things again. They don't make them like they used to, and by the looks of it, they never will again.

MarkOskar

Journey of a Lifetime

2009-10-08T18:38:00.004-04:00

Sometimes posts about tennis really aren't important at all.

A friend to the family, and the sister of an old high school friend was born with CF (Cystic Fibrosis). She fights a war inside her body while waiting for new lungs. Natalia is in her thirties, married, and is a proud mom to Scarlett through surrogacy.

It is a story that most of us simply can't comprehend, however is a story that inspires thousands and reminds us that perspective is a must in a material and often shallow world.

You may not know Natalia, but I encourage you to read her story here.
Please also take a look at http://recycleme.org/, or google search for an organization closer to your own home. You or a loved one could save a life.

Thank you for your time.
MarkOskar

Professional Tennis and H1N1

2009-09-28T18:54:00.005-04:00

It is now the end of September, and here in Toronto, the weather is cooling and the leaves are beginning to turn into brilliant colors. With the cooler weather we also enter flu season along with the rest of the northern hemisphere. This 2009 year is a bit unique however. Where seasonal H1N1 historically has ruled the influenza roost, the relatively new novel H1N1 (Swine Flu) has begun competing with seasonal H1N1 and all of the other Influenza A viruses. This one appears different though, and that is because it is.

Novel H1N1 is a virus that has gone significant enough genetic change to "create" a new virus for which we have no immunity to at this stage. The virus is a reassortment of four known strains of influenza, one endemic in human, one in avian, and two in swine.

No, I'm not a virologist, a biologist, or anyone else that may dabble in this for pay, however I have been drawn to evolutionary theory for some time, and about 4 years ago, began reading about influenza in greater detail. It's fascinating stuff, and the influenza virus is an easy (easier) way to watch evolution in action.

Since the strain is new, and we have no immunity to it, it has great potential to cause health systems around the world significant stress. Will it be 1918 all over again? We hope not, and based on the secondary condition of bacterial pneumonia that the infected obtained back in 1918 (and many, many, many died), we have a better chance to deal with those types of issues. That is of course if the virulence of the influenza changes for the worse, and we simply don't know if it will at this point. Currently there are 4,282 deaths worldwide according to the European Center for Desiese Prevention and Control, while "Flutrackers" (Google it) is showing 5,486 as of about four hours ago. This number has about doubled since mid-august.

Believe me, this post isn't meant to scare, or bring fear to the reader, it's merely a take on the situation at hand. It is actually our flu season and yes, school has started. As cases start rising, so will greater unfortunate eventualities.

So what's your point?
Well, Tennis and sports in general have some thinking to do here. From Football to Basketball, to Golf and Tennis, the sporting world brings large numbers of people together and groups of people around the world. No, it's certainly not time to limit events or anything even remotely along those lines, but what if this takes a turn for the worse? How does the International Tennis Federation respond? How does the I.T.F. respond to sponsors, fans, and its players? At what point do Tennis governing bodies actually put thought into action? At what point does anyone? Is the I.T.F. even the responsible party here?

Making a recent switch from the private sector (financial) to the public sector (provincial government), I've now seen two very different organizations actually performing very similar and thorough planning. In the case of the public sector organization, they have a duty to inform, guide, and assist the public, and its employee population. Contingency plans are made, revised, reviewed, and approved. These documents allow the organization to pro-actively make decisions that are in the best interest of its success, its employees health, and often the health of a greater population. If you work in a larger sized private company, there's a good chance they have one, and dusted it off recently to ensure that plans have been updated to the current environment. It you are in the public sector, surely you have quite detailed planning in place.

Does the I.T.F. have a formal plan in place should something like this affect the federation? Well, I emailed the I.T.F., and asked them. I received a very kind note from a Communications Officer in the U.K. stating that it is very difficult to have a specific contingency plan (addressing H1N1) that could address all events around the world, sanctioned by the I.T.F., and those that are not. There are of course junior events, David Cup, Fed Cup, Wheelchair Tennis, and the primary professional circuits. The response went on to note that when regional/national bodies ask, they are advised to consult their local health authorities. The I.T.F. confirmed their watchful eye, and will make appropriate decisions based on the events.

So what I get from this is that contingency planning isn't foreign to the I.T.F., however there doesn't appear to be a unified plan in place that may specifically address this event. They will react accordingly based on national/regional signals from health authorities. The global reach of the I.T.F. makes a unified contingency plan near impossible. That doesn't suggest that there isn't any kind of contingency plan, however there was no indication of a plan that addresses this pandemic event.

I see the complexity in this matter and certainly respect their decision to take signals from local health authorities, however because of the differing preparedness and response of national governments and health authorities, I would like to suggest that if the I.T.F. cannot build a single unified contingency preparation plan for its global presence, then it build or adopt a single response plan to various situations. Not all national or health authorities will react with Z if situation Q occurs. That is troubling given that players may be coming from all parts of the globe and expect a reasonable amount of contingency preparedness ensuring their safety. This is what multi-national corporations are doing, isn't it? Why not build a response plan that bases its decisions off of a standard that is acting in the Federations best interests? Does the Federation know whether Egypt will react the same to the U.K. if situation Q occurs? (I'm really asking). I think Egypt and the U.K should react the same, and the Federation as well.

I'm not attempting to bash the I.T.F. here, I think they are in a unique situation here based on their truly global reach. It is complex with so many local and regionally sanctioned events, and it is a difficult thing to put in place, when really, no one has the answers for what tomorrow brings.

Virulence may never increase, and if we are a bit lucky, the influenza settles itself and eventually becomes nothing more than a seasonal pain to human kind, it almost surely will one way or another. I hope that organizations that bring many people together in varying regions of this globe work to prepare and pro-actively take action that is in the best interest of everyone.
I am not asking anyone to put anything in motion, just prepare.

I have five tennis racquets in my tennis bag.

MarkOskar

Roger Federer: Top 5 Video Tributes and Moments

2009-09-24T19:12:00.005-04:00

Greetings everyone.
So my previous article hung Roger a bit out to dry as several of you suggested. It wasn't meant to be a low blow on the Swiss star, but an idea based on where he is in life, and in tennis, and where others are going in the tennis world.

Let me shed some sunshine on Roger this time around by presenting my favorite (top-5) Roger Federer tributes and moments (that I can find on Youtube) over a tennis career that hasn't finished and will go in history as the greatest.

#5 - This may actually be #1, but what the heck, it'll provide a bit of a hook to keep you watching. Remarkable images from all of Roger's 15 slam titles including the 2009 French and 2009 Wimbledon marathon against Andy Roddick. Set to great music, sit back and enjoy this.

#4 - This person who creates some of these video tributes to Roger Federer "GoRogerFederer1" could very easily be doing this professionally (if not already). This video is a very high quality black and white piece that dives into Roger's emotional moments. It is a great production with beautiful music that makes you appreciate Federer that much more.

#3 - Another "GoRogerFederer1" production. It's a tribute to his 2009 Wimbledon and French victories. Stunning slow motion (high quality) footage that let's you see the essence of Roger in action. Again, if this guy isn't doing this professionally, he certainly has a knack for it.

#2 - This one takes a special talent which I only wish I had. Short, sweet, and unique. Talented artist on Roger Federer.

#1 - I've had this as a YouTube favorite for some time now. Sure the quality could be a little bit better, but the combination of music and commentary put to Roger's mastery creates a perfect little piece which has multiple watch value. Enjoy!

Roger Federer: The End is Nigh

2009-09-19T20:15:00.005-04:00

For those who don't read my blog on a regular basis (99.9999999% worlds population), you should know that while I certainly are a Federer fan, I can also be critical of one of the worlds greatest athletes, and certainly the big dog in the tennis world.

When I write the title "The End is Nigh", Fedo-philes are surely going to perk their ears and take notice. That isn't the intention here. It is merely an observation based on where Roger is in life, personally and on the court that makes me think this way. Is this post a notice that Roger is done? No. Is Roger going to go slamless the rest of the way now? Absolutely not. The problem lies in a couple of areas that brings be great concern that the Greatest of All Time (GOAT) is about to ride off into the sunset.

"What the hell does that mean?" you say...

It means that Roger Federer days are numbered in the following categories;

Worlds #1
The man to beat

"You are bloody insane!" you suggest.

Well, ok maybe, but let me at least give you the reasons why I think Roger may now have a very small window of slam-hauling before he becomes the senior stateman, paving the way for the younger generation, and very shortly, handing over the reigns to a younger, more capable athlete. I will produce this in a simple list, and you can crucify me later...

Life isn't about tennis, however Roger didn't truly understand this until a short while ago. Getting married, and significantly more important, having kids, changes your perspective drastically on life and your approach to life. There are simply more important things out there than breathing tennis 24-7.
He has nearly acomplished everything possible to accomplish in tennis. Aussi Open? Check. French Open? Oh yeah! Wimbledon? In spades. U.S. Open? A handfull. Worlds #1? Twice now. Career slam haul title? You betcha! There is more out there, but what is important Roger has acquired, 2009 being an obviously very important year for this. What stands in front of Roger still? Well, go ask Rod Laver...But Roger isn't going to get it, and he knows it. His window on that front is long gone, and so everything material to accomplish has been achieved.
The Next Generation - Roger has a strangle hold on many of the current generation stars. He knows Nadal will struggle to stay healthy, and can pick his spots to be triumphant. The likes of Del Potro, Monfils, Cilic, Tsonga...etc...Could really not give a damn however. Things are changing fast, and time marches onward. Federer is an athlete however, and undoubtedly will match opponents with stamina heading into the 5th set, but that's not what I'm getting at. The younger generation isn't named "Haas", "Djokovic", or "Roddick". They are a new breed of players who really don't hold the same fear that the existing generation have. The men's circuit is brutally deep, things are changing quickly, and like Mike Tyson found out, your pedestal can grow shorter just as fast as it grew.
The Nadal Factor - His ultimate opponent. THE foe to Roger. He knows his window is narrow, and in 2010, I expect Nadal to be throwing down hammers...should the lad stay healthy.
Number five is the most important reason of the bunch, you may disagree with it, but I sense differently. Roger is at peace with himself. He accepted defeat in New York. He didn't shed a tear. He wasn't in sorrow or pain. Roger played four quality sets, and got throttled in one, and didn't blink (enough times). You may not, but I struggle with this. We saw Aussi Open 2009, and Federer couldn't take it. His tears from defeat were genuinely from caring more than any other human being on this planet cares more about winning tennis slams. This was IT for Roger! It's not now. To me that's a great thing (see point number one), but to people who are truly freak Fed-fans, this should be disaster. The greats of all sports were greats because they had insane talent, but more importantly, their competitive fire raged larger, and their focus was that much more tunneled.

While it doesn't/shouldn't work quite the same in real life, when you accept defeat in professional sports, you begin heading down another road. This road isn't nessessarily bad, it's just different. Winning all four slams in one year exits the system, being number one exits the system, ruling over the tennis steerage doesn't seem to be it any longer. Roger is entering this place. The changing of the guard is going to happen shortly, and just like Federer did one afternoon at Wimbledon against Sampras, the same will happen to him.

It may already have.

MarkOskar

The Tennis News Authority

10 Parting Thoughts From the 2009 U.S. Open

2009-09-15T19:13:00.003-04:00

Now what the heck do we do? Majors are over for the season, but there's still some tennis to be played before the brief break, and then we are right back into the 2010 season.
This U.S. Open was a particularly interesting edition, even bizarre at times. Let's walk through some of those moments and then look to the future.

Unless you really have something against Del Potro, you saw this coming. Maybe not this fast, but it's hard to deny the tools that the 20 year old Argentine carries with him. Huge serving, and a deadly forehand, however he's capable of intelligent tennis, and capable of evolving his game to suit his needs better, mid-match. Future #1? You betcha.
I was visiting the U.S. Open when Clijsters last won the title and recall her on the Sunday holding her trophy and taking pictures, tirelessly for the crew and the thousands clammering to get their own "perfect shot" by the fountain on grounds. Sure, they would all do it, but somehow I got the sense that she could have done this all evening, until the last fan got their shot. There's a genuine, real-person feel about her. It's wasn't about endorsements, bling, or fame and recognition. Refreshingly she's back. Welcome back Kim!
So we have now Serena-gate and foul mouthed Roger. What the bloody @#$@^ is @#$^ going on around here? If someone doesn't @$#^ tell me, I'm going to shove this @#$@ laptop up all of your @#$@^@ noses!!! ;)
Somone else needs to say this (again)...What in the world was Dick thinking, and the networks and anyone else by almost completely denying Juan Martin from speaking a few words in Spanish? When he first was "denied" by Dick my jaw nearly dropped right off. It's HIS moment! Not Roger's (who had the mic handed to him), and certainly not a car maker, or not the damn tournament directors, or whoever she was. Almost disaster, thankfully averted.
I'm big on Wozniaki and she will break-through, but I'm curious to see what her peak actually is. I'm not sure she'll be a #1 player, but stranger things exist in this world with the rankings, and if she does one day get there, it will be deserving for a woman with awesome perspective on things (see her post-match interviews). Can't wait to watch her in Australia.
I do a Gulbis post about once a month here, and I hard-pressed to find potentially a bigger waste of young talent. This guy can dwarf Del Potro's forehand, return of serve, and serve, but is missing the key component that Del Potro has in spades - Maturity (and possibly something other than speed - "Blazing"). He didn't even seem to truly care in his early loss?!?!
I stick by thinking Pam Shriver is the worst voice-crew currently employed, although the local guys here in Toronto covering the Roger's Cup come pretty darn close. Any other former player can come up with insight, but Pam adds awkwardness, and has a knack for saying really dumb things at the wrong time. Brad Gilbert needs to go also, although better court-side then in studio.
I sighed in relief when watching Roger accept loss in front of the crowd. He showed composure, grace, and intelligence. He also accepted defeat....He accepted it....Hmmmmm, He ACCEPTED IT...And there it goes folks! Done, finit, empire officially about to be slammed.
Here's hoping Rafa gets his body quickly for 2010. This could be a banner year coming up for tennis. The depth in the mens game is just amazing. Roger, Rafa, Del Potro, Murray, Roddick, Tsonga, Del Potro, Cilic, Monfils...and the list goes onward. Awesome stuff.
Which is unfortunately not exactly the same with the ladies. While Wozniaki intrigues, Oudin pumps up Yankee blood, and Clijsters creates some "glue" for the WTA, we need much much more. I can see a host of players in the top-30 who need to step it up in 2010.

Have a rest everyone, enjoy the fall!

MarkOskar

Del Potro: The Slammin' Nimble Giant

2009-09-14T20:12:00.004-04:00

When I ran this post back in early April on Del Potro, I really didn't expect such a lofty ascent for the big man, so quickly. Sure he clearly had top-3 potential, but a slam so soon? Is he the next number one? Or will Nadal, or Murray take this claim to tennis superiority when Empire-Federer finally settles into the night?

In case you haven't noticed, I'm a big Del Potro fan. I'm amazed at how a 6'6" player can move like a 6'1" player, yet hit with such ferocity. It's a marvel to watch him lumber across a court, and then just pulverize the ball into another universe.

If someone should take tennis on his back, I say Del Potro. Sure Nadal brings masses to watch, but so will Del Potro, heck, he's only twenty years old!

At 6'6" though, you have to wonder how long a player like Del Potro can keep up such an elevated game. At those heights, tennis isn't an easy game to stay injury free, especially in this era of tennis.

We appear to have a new horse in town, and this isn't a one-trick-pony

Federer-Del Potro 2009: In Progress, Torn to Pick a Side

2009-09-14T19:04:00.005-04:00

As the men's final carries on early in the fourth set, I continue to struggle with picking one to root for. Do I pick the ultimate tennis player and living legend in Federer? Or my favorite upstart that's actually playing great tennis (see Gulbis), and ready to break through? The silky smooth magician? Or the kid with brute, brute, brute force?

I love watching Federer triumph, add to his records, and become even more immortal. It's enthralling, powerful, and makes you feel like you are watching something special...Because you are? Nothing lasts forever though, and like every great empire, there is the fall. There is that player that not only challenges, but capable of toppling the giant. Del Potro is just that figure. Not only can he topple Federer...He also thoroughly handed to a useless Nadal in the previous round. Nevermind Nadal's injuries, Del Potro didn't give Nadal breathing room. He can also topple Federer, and I suspect before Federer retires, he will destroy him on a court somewhere.

I believe Del Potro is the next man. If Federer didn't exist, he was be ascending uncontrollably into top spot. He's doing it as I type this too, now up a break, and dominating Federer in a fourth set burst. It's an awesome display.

There's another set to go though, and this is far from over. Never count a wounded tiger out, it's when they are most dangerous. I suspect Federer will weather this storm into the fifth and we could be in for a treat of a finish.

Now Vs. The Future. It doesn't get any better than this.

MarkOskar

Serena Williams Meltdown 2009: Video Evidence

2009-09-13T20:54:00.004-04:00

Here we have the evidence of what Serena Williams really said to the lines person.
We appear to have the following: "I swear to God I’ll fucking take this ball and shove it down your fucking throat! Do you hear me? I swear to God. You better be glad–you better be fucking glad that I’m not, I swear.”

Wow.

Serena Williams: White Trash?

2009-09-13T14:05:00.002-04:00

Note to reader: This post is harsh.

Should people in this world be accountable for their actions? Should they be responsible for what they say or what they do? Of course, yes.

Did Serena Williams cross the line at the end of her losing affair against Kim Clijsters? Oh yes, she did.

Should Serena take a heavy fine, and further discipline from the tennis world? Indeed.

Is Serena Williams "White Trash"? Depends on who you talk to.

In the heat of battle, Serena lost it and let a lines official have it, suggesting that if she could, she'd stuff a tennis ball down her throat. It was much harsher than I just described, and I'm sure you've seen the replays on television. With Clijsters not quite sure what was taking place, Serena showed her "Richard Williams" side and acted like a complete idiot and lost some self control. This happens all the time in sports, perhaps it's more startling when we see the women engage in this type of behavior, however in any event, there is no excuse for physically threatening anyone.

Let's get this straight, Serena Williams went over to a lines official and threatened her. No matter how bad calls could be, there is absolutely no justification for such action by anyone at any time.

I at one point rooted for Serena when she was much younger and her true self hadn't quite came across to the public. Over the years though, through post-match interviews and other forums for Serena to display her lack of intelligence or lack of charm, and generally bad attitude, I now am convinced that Serena is not just a moron, she is also white trash.

Her game is a pleasure to watch, it's just a shame that the world has put up with such arrogance and ignorance. I hope the WTA officals, or whomever may review this fines Serena with vigor, and even considers a short term ban. This is a great opportunity to send a message to the other players, the young people of the world, and fans, that tennis has no room for such stupidity.

Clijsters and Wozniaki in the final, enjoy everyone!

MarkOskar
The Tennis News Authority

With Rain, Odds are Heavily Against Nadal

2009-09-11T14:53:00.005-04:00

With rain messing up schedules now and we still don't have the Nadal-Gonzo quarterfinal match complete (7-6, 6-6), the odds of Nadal making the 2009 final is looking slimmer and slimmer. With less than perfect knees, an abdominal issue, and the thought of a tight tight schedule to get this tournament completed, Nadal is going to really have to "Believe" to make it anywhere further.

Let's start with the Gonzo match. Gonzo isn't being intimited by Nadal (he rarely is of anyone), and is playing great tennis. His serve is working, his forehand lethal, and Nadal isn't penetrating the weaker backhand with overwhelming success. The match currently sits 7-6, 6-6 (3-2). So Nadal is up a set, and I believe on serve in this 2nd set tie-break. Now, Friday afternoon, Nadal needs to play at least two more sets, a potential semi-final, and possibly a final within the next 48 hours or so.

Should he beat Gonzo, he is facing a very well rested, and break-through ready giant in Del Potro. If Nadal were entirely 100% and without even his time off, I'd still be calling this 50/50 or slight advantage to Del Potro. He's just that ready. With Nadal clearly hurting physically, and losing the days rest to play, he is at a severe disadvantage to make it into the final where Federer will surely be lurking with killer instinct. I give Nadal a 5%, maybe 10% chance of winning that showdown.

The longer this rain goes on in New York, the slimmer Nadal's chances get to push through into the final.

Let's hope they get this tennis going soon.
MarkOskar

U.S. Open 2009: Del Potro and Wozniaki demolish their Upstart Opponents

2009-09-10T18:09:00.004-04:00

It's a bit of old news at this point, however Wozniaki played stellar (smart) tennis to dismantle a clearly nervous, and perhaps emotionally drained Melanie Oudin in straight sets 6-2, 6-2. While I'm probably in the minority here, at least in North America, I was rooting for Wozniaki all the way. Cinderella should pay her dues too. Wozniaki clearly has, and is THE one ready for the break through in my mind. Melanie Oudin is just a kid, a great talent, and the future of American tennis, but still just a kid. Give her time to mature, she'll get there, and without dropping F-Bombs on International television.

With Juan Martin Del Potro's "crushing" of Cilic, at least in the fourth set (6-0), he sets up the probable clash against Rafael Nadal. I'm going to be in the minority here again, but I'm rooting for Del Potro all the way, and I'm even expecting Del Potro's break-through. Folks, he's that good, plays that big, and this is one hell of a stage for the big man to do it. It won't come easy (if it comes at all), because Nadal is playing some sinister tennis out there. He's come along just fine, and I could be dead wrong with this prediction, but what the heck, lay it out there!

For Del Potro to be successful he's going to have to do several things out there against Nadal:

Serve big - High percentage stuff.
Keep it short - Nadal's knee or Del Potro's curious fitness? I'll assume Nadal will have the advantage here, so Del Potro needs to play big all the time.
ATTACK!!! - ...Nadal's second serve in the theme of keeping it short. Open it up out there, long rallies, long match will give advantage to Nadal.

I'm always getting ahead of myself, and here I'm doing it again. Perhaps Gonzalez thinks so too.
Have fun!

MarkOskar

U.S. Open 2009: A Stage for the Next Generation of Stars

2009-09-09T18:39:00.005-04:00

Oudin, Cilic, Isner, Wozniaki, Wickmayer, Bondarenko, Del Potro, even Soderling.
What do all these players have in common? They went deep and/or made big upsets at the Open. What else? Well, they are young, and represent a new(er) generation of tennis players ready to make their mark.

It's been an exciting U.S. Open tournament this year. We've seen Melanie Oudin play Cinderella and captivate an entire nation with her gutsy tennis. We were in awe watching Isner dismantle Roddick with bombs-away serve, and fire-in-the-belly attitude. Cilic stunned us all by thoroughly throttling a bewildered Andy Murray and now letting the world see what so many have been talking about for some time. We've seen Wozniaki and Del Potro, already hyped up players quietly, and methodically advance through the draw, beating all challengers with quality ball, and often, at slam winning levels.

Soderling may get slain horribly again tonight by Federer, but what a year the young Swede has had so far. If Federer didn't exist, could he have won the French? Could he have advanced tonight? I'm totally writing him off here, but I shouldn't be. Soderling is built to surprise. His game is built for hot play with a chip on his shoulder. I think it's more the perspective Robin needs to bring onto the court, than a new game against Federer. He needs to hate Roger, and build the war in his head from the ground up to win.

When all is said and done at the Open this year, these young stars won't be (done). Unless Serena and Roger continue to keep their strangle-hold on slam tennis, one or more of these mentioned players will be taking slams in 2010. You can bet on it.

The future of tennis is looking good.

MarkOskar

U.S. Open 2009: Del Potro with Opening!

2009-09-08T19:14:00.004-04:00

After pretty the demolition of Ferrero to reach the quarter-finals of the U.S. Open (6-3, 6-3, 6-3), Mr. Del Potro has a real opportunity here to reach the semis and I'm eyeing him in the finals.

Are you a mad man you say? No, and here's why...
Del Potro's biggest knock is his ability to play at the same level throughout a tournament due to fatigue. We saw that in Toronto, and we'll see it again in the future. He's a big man, who plays like a much smaller man in terms of agility. However, at the U.S. Open he is getting a full day to rest up the body and go back into battle 100% and fresh. This is huge for Del Potro, and why I'm convinced he will be a multi-major winner before all is said and done.

Del Potro has been solid in New York thus far. He has lost just one set, and otherwise hasn't really been challenged. He will be in Cilic who just throttled a clearly distracted (?) Andy Murray, but I'm not convinced that Del Potro shouldn't lose more than a set here and advance into potentially Nadal territory. Cilic is seeking that big break-out too, but he's in uncharted waters at this point, and may (may) have a slight Murray-Hangover. In any event, I see Del Potro's game being too big on the hard stuff for Cilic right now.

Back to this Nadal comment...Let's presume that Nadal does make it into the semis. In order for this returning Spaniard to do that he's going to have to beat crowd favorite Monfils, and then Tsonga or Gonzalez. I expect Monfils to give Rafa all kinds of problems tonight, and should he advance, I'd actually give the edge to Tsonga who's playing great, or a split call should Gonzalez advance. It's not going to be easy for any of those other four players to survive to meet Del Potro, which could play right into the Argentines hands for the run into the final.

Is this all magically going to happen as I just suggested, it could, but maybe it won't. But that's the beauty of sport in general. Speculate all we want, we don't really know what is going to happen when we get the mega-elite playing one another (perhaps excluding Federer).

I do know that the remaining matches tonight, and the upcoming quarterfinals should be awesome. I'm even looking forward to Soderling-Federer, and while I thoroughly expect Federer to hand it to Soderling again, Robin is a player that will surprise you when you've really written him off.

Should be fun!
MarkOskar

Melanie Oudin: "Come ON!"

2009-09-07T14:12:00.004-04:00

We all love the 17 year old, 5'6" Russian-slaying American in Melanie Oudin. She's gutsy, athletic, and can strike a pretty good ball too. Her versatile play however is lacking desperately in one department, the motivational shout-out.

Melanie has been watching Lleyton Hewitt a bit too much and she's reaching a critical point of shout-out maturation where she can either officially co-own "Come on", or evolve her self-motivational practices and add a few more of these crowd pleasing phrases. This evolution is natural, and will help Oudin take things to the next level.

Let's take a look at five of Oudin's options...

"Let's Go!" - A classic used by both the men and women for years. If she is coming ("Come on"), then she should also add the going.
"Yes I Can!" - Obama told American that they can, Oudin can put this to practice.
"You're Not The Boss of Me!!!" - She's 17, I can't think of a better display of defiance out there for the young teenager.
"Like, Come'on!" - She's also blond and yes, still a teenager. Adding "Like" is a simple addition that won't throw her off too much as this evolution takes place.
"Ostav'te menja v pokoe" - As we've noted, she's a teenager, and a Russian-slayer. What could be more perfect that picking up some tongue of her fallen Russian foe? "Ostav'te menja v pokoe" reads "Leave Me Alone!" in English. Ooo, that would get her opponents water boiling!

All in good fun folks!
Enjoy the tennis.
MarkOskar

U.S. Open 2009: Weekend Thoughts from a Developing Major

2009-09-07T09:32:00.008-04:00

The U.S. Open has turned the corner to head into the second week, a week reserved for the elite players of the tennis world. While it has some unlikely characters, and some inspiring newcomers, it also has a lot of who we'd expect to be there, and this is all good. Too much of the expected can be a bad thing. This edition of the Open doesn't have this though, most of the story lines we want still exist, and some pleasant surprises arrive to put a stamp on the future of tennis. Let's take a look at what developed over the weekend.

One of the biggest stories with the women is the return of Kim Clijsters. She is playing inspired ball out there, looking like she never left. The defeat of Venus instantly gives her the cred to become a real threat to win this thing, however she's staring a head on collision with...
Serena Williams, has lost seventeen games in four matches thus far. She's only really had a slight test (if you want to call it that) in round three against M.J.M. Sanchez. With the exception of a true showcase match for women's tennis against Clijsters looming, Serena still holds favorite and can put another stamp on who is really the best female in tennis.
Melanie Oudin, Oudin, Oudin...Where do we begin? I actually won't begin. Enjoy watching her, but don't worry, she'll be around for many years to come. Awesome stuff.
Ladies Match of the day - Kuznetsova Vs. Wozniaki. Russian Bear squares off against the Vikings daughter. I like this one, both are flying under the radar and I wouldn't be surprised at all if one of these two are heading into the finals next weekend (Sorry Oudin). While we all talk about Oudin, I ask, when is it the Danes turn to really break on through?
Mens Match of the day - This is a pretty tough call. There are four solid matches to watch today, however I'm picking Davydenko and Soderling. Hmmm, Russian Bear and Viking theme today? We have the upstart Swede against "Gamblor" (See "The Simpsons"). I got Soderling on this one, and so should you.
Honorable mention goes to Isner and Verdasco. Isner was a rock against Roddick mentally and physically. He really could have crumbled with the crowd in Andy's court, his body looking tired at moments, and his in-experience weighing heavy. Give the young giant loads of credit though, he dug deep and showed some serious mental toughness taking it 7-6.
Speaking of Andy Roddick, how difficult it must be to genuinely bring his game back to an elevated level in 2009, but also be handed such brutal (difficult) defeats. Tight matches, including the tightest of all time at Wimbledon. It's encouraging, but oh so painful. What did Jelena Dokic say the other day? Something about how many times you get back up (not how many times you fall)...
Doubles watch: Bryan brothers and Nester/Zimonjic remain on collision course for the finals showdown. Folks, these four athletes are the best doubles players in some generations. Get it on the television CBC! Write about it Jon Wertheim and Co.!
Someone at CNNSI noted that the McEnroe commentating duo was not quite right, and they are great on their own, but together slightly awkward. I 100% agree with this assessment, however I would be surprised if they couldn't figure each other out over time to make it one of the more interesting pairs in commentating. As for Pam Shriver, uh, let's forget that one.
Go take a look what's in store for the entire round of 16 with the men. There are still a host of mega-stars with a potential quarterfinal that could look like this:

Federer - Soderling (Re-match, can Soderling ever be "due"?)
Djokovic - Isner/Verdasco (Intriguing)
Tsonga - Nadal/Monfils (Awesome! Awesome, Awesome!)
Del Potro - Cilic/Murray (Del Potro is getting rest, be wary of him)

This is getting good.

MarkOskar

U.S Open 2009: Now We're Getting Interesting!

2009-09-04T21:22:00.005-04:00

As we head into the first weekend of the 2009 edition of the U.S. Open, the draws are starting to play out, upsets are being had, and anticipated match-ups are becoming reality.
It wasn't long ago that many of us picked Dementieva to pose a serious threat for the title on the women's side, and here we are now wondering how far Melanie Oudin could actually go.

I'm enjoying this years edition of the Open because there's a little bit of what we want to happen (see men's draw), mixed in with some good quality surprises. Have we seen more interesting first weeks? Sure, but take a look at the bottom half of the men's draw and tell me that World War III isn't about to happen down there.

I'm enjoying the fact that Gruel gave Roger Federer two sets of very real challenge. I'm enjoying the fact that this young American (Oudin) is giving a new hope to the future of American tennis. I love the fact that James Blake is surviving into the weekend, and I also simply couldn't aniticipate Soderling-Querry enough. If what I expect comes true from Sam and Robin, we could have one of the matches of the tournament in the immediate future. I like both guys really, Sam is riding a wave of results and ranking ascention, while Robin is this bizare combination of stubborn alpha-loner with a great personality. It doesn't hurt that when he's on, the guy can hit some serious shots out there.

The weekend is going to be great. If you have the ability to record matches, do so. Hell, Clijsters is ravaging opponents out there. Mary Carillo expects a Serena-Clijsters showdown, and I'm certainly not one to argue with this. Kim is playing hot, and has the New York crowd behind her.
Not a bad combination. It also doesn't hurt that she's getting these days of rest in between matches.

So I blog with Nadal putting Kiefer into another universe, absolutely destroying him (6-0 in first), and I put a smile on my face.

The tennis universe holds true. The anticipation will continue to build, and those matches will become reality.

Enjoy the weekend everyone, enjoy the tennis, and get out and hit a ball while you can.

MarkOskar

U.S. Open 2009: 10 Notes on Days 3 and 4

2009-09-03T19:12:00.004-04:00

Dementieva crashes out to a young American. Jankovic and Ivanovic continue their inconsistent play, and the men continue to roll almost entirely as expected. It's been an interesting week already out there. Let's take a look at ten more thoughts on the U.S. Open action thus far.

Ivanovic and Jankovic days are numbered. While Jankovic appears to have greater potential for surviving a bit longer, Ana is clearly in a spiral downward, and it's not in her head, her game needs some serious re-tooling.
Melanie Oudin, the young American who went into the fourth round at Wimbledon is continuing her maturation as a serious contender. You wouldn't know it watching the Dementieva match, but I'm still not convinced she's ready for a slam. Maybe by next week she will be ;)
The big guns on the men's side are walking through this with relative ease thus far. Federer, Nadal, Roddick (playing tonight), and Djokovic (on court now) haven't really had any kind of scare in their early matches. Perhaps expected...
Federer should have a solid test against Lleyton Hewitt in the third round, one of our first true showcase matches of the tournament. Expect Hewitt to fight like hell, but we all know how this should turn out.
Adios Marat Safin! You wowed us with crazy raw talent. You made us laugh with your on-court character, and post-match interview. You made us shake our head in astonishment that someone so talented could serve up the results you did.
Should Blake survive into the fourth round to face Federer and presumably lose, I would consider this a great success for the struggling American. A great success. Let's hope he moves on and beats Robredo to face Federer.
For the record, winning the Open will net you $1.6M, doubles teams get $420K, and mixed will net the pair $150K. What's encouraging to see is that even third round qualifying losers earn $8K for their troubles. Not bad.
Ok, Rafa got a haircut everyone. Is it more like Federer's like so many are noting? Well, sure, if shorter hair is more like Federer's. I don't know, seems silly.
Sharapova is on again tonight under the lights, in a showcase match. Not bad for the 20th-something seed. Do any of the players care that the one-time U.S. Open champ is being handed such prime-time t.v. space?
...And finally, Kim Clijsters is on a collision course with Venus Williams should they both win their next match, and they will. I'm not sure what to say here, for whatever reason, I feel like Kim not only can win this match, I'm expecting her to. Should be fun!

Enjoy the tennis!
MarkOskar

Jelena Dokic: She'll Get Up Again

2009-09-02T19:50:00.004-04:00

With a first round loss at the 2009 U.S. Open, Jelena Dokic's comeback has essentially fizzled, for now. After her magical run at the Australian Open, capturing the hearts of fans around the world, the once troubled star has struggled to win matches, keep her body healthy, and avoid sickness.

Think back to the French Open this year, when she was dominating Elena Dementieva and then unfortunately had to withdraw with a lower back injury. It was truly unfortunate, because she was primed to win this match (and look how Dementieva is looking now!), and this really took the wind out of all her sails.

From there Jelena crashed at Wimbledon and battled Mono. We all should know exactly what this sickness does to the body. Look no further than Roger Federer only a short while ago and it's easy to see what mono can do to an athlete.

So Jelena's season is essentially done, and it'll surely be some time before we can consider her (again) to work that magic on the court. I can't wait, because there's truly something inspiring about watching her fight on court. The piercing eyes, and the punchers spirit, you can't miss it.

I trust that she will come back too, her perspective is in the right spot, and she's bright enough to do so. After her loss in round one at the U.S. Open, she gave us this... "It counts how many times you get up, not how many times you fall down.".

Damn right Jelena!

U.S. Open 2009: Ivanovic Suffers Nail in the Coffin

2009-09-02T19:10:00.005-04:00

After Murray took the first set against my one-time hot pick (many moons ago) Gulbis, the broadcast switched over to the thrilling finally of Ana Ivanovic and the Ukranian Bondarenko.
The two had locked horns for hours and it was coming down to a final tie-break, the only slam to employ such a sadistic way to end a match. It is indeed sadistic, however somehow fitting, especially under the New York lights.

With the two looking nervous, tired, and tense, the tie-break began. Some tentative serving, missed balls, and challenged calls, kept things close until Ivanovic held a match-point. Surely the former #1 will pull this out? No, and play continued until finally Bondarenko took the final point to crush Ana's already disapointing year.

Ivanovic hasn't had much success here in New York. She made it into the fourth round in 2007, and last year, spat out an egg in the second. It's been an odd decline for the player with model-like looks, and a perfect personality to find stardom, however the game simply isn't there anymore.

Put her next to Serena, Safina, or Dementieva and from a physical perspective you'll know exactly what I mean. Her balls are relatively soft, her (new) serve at least last night, stunk, and there is zero intimidation factor.

I feel bad for her at times, I shouldn't, and I've laid into what I think of her (and Jankovic) many times in this blog, but something needs to change drastically for Ana if she wants to stick around and be relevant to top tennis.

My immediate thoughts on how to change are simple:
1) Cut the crap with this serve motion (you too Sharapova). This is horrible coaching from folks who know better, who are using club-player "C" class instruction on top players. The motion is extremely limiting on potential and won't cut it against the top players. Sharapova, because of reach may get away with it, but forget about it Ivanovic. Shame on you coaches!

2) You need to work on your physical fitness, much like Safina and Dementieva. I'm not talking about pure aerobic stuff (though that never hurts)...Ana, it's time to hit the gym and start building some popeye. The game has changed too much, and you aren't good enough as a pure tactician.

I'm being hard on Ivanovic, but something clearly needs to change out there for her.
Let's hope she uses the fall/winter season to turn things around.

MarkOskar

U.S. Open Tennis: 10 Notes on Day 1 and 2

2009-09-01T19:29:00.005-04:00

The 2009 U.S. Open Tennis Championships are in full swing now and it's been a fun ride thus far. Despite the 2009 edition still being in its infancy, let's have a look at what is to note.

Heeeere's Johnny! I mean, onto the list!

Ok, I'm annoyed, Canadian's (or anyone outside of the U.S. cannot watch the "Live" tennis from the U.S. Open website. While it's more complex than just flipping a switch, this stinks!
I wish ticketmaster would evolve, somehow, to just provide a more intuitive site for tickets. It took me 20 minutes to check for various tickets in Arthur Ashe stadium, just to find that they are actually unavailable. Ughhh.
While it'll provide more consistency in the long run, I'm really not a huge fan of Maria Sharapova's revamped service motion. It's lost all flow, creativity, and looks like a junior hack. Sharapova looks great however.
Donald Young, where are you? First round loss for the "youngster", and it continues to look not so bright for Mr. Young.
Federer-Hewitt in round three will be super, watch the schedule and tune into that one. Sure Federer has an overwhelming edge here, but we could have a great fight.
Tsonga is looking ugly out there, and by ugly I mean dominant. First round, but that's a thrashing.
Kanepi bows out in first round, the young Estonian player has lost in the first round (get this...) the last nine tournaments in a row. For a top-30 player, that's awfully awful.
Dementieva Vs. Oudin in the second round. That is another super match-up, though I suspect the hot Dementieva will crush the very young American's hopes.
It's a shame that Wozniaki is in the same quarter as Dementieva. I would love to see her in a quarter sans Serena or Elena at this point, and see where it goes. We all eye the monster-breakout, but where is it?
I'm calling it well in advance folks. It's Nestor and Zimonjic to take the mens doubles following up on their thrilling Wimbledon title. Zimonjic played particularly well at Wimbledon, and he'll do it again. Danny Nestor is simply the best doubles specialist in the world, and the combo should see gold.

Doug Flutie at the U.S. Open: Inspiring

2009-08-31T18:28:00.008-04:00

He isn't going to beat Federer, or even Gulbis anytime soon on the tennis court, but he can hurl a football in the most dramatic style as good as anyone has in the past. The Hail Mary pass with Boston College continues to be legendary, but that is not why Mr. Flutie is being honored in Arthur Ashe stadium...

Doug Flutie, here tonight, in Flushing Meadows is being honored for his charitable work with his established Doug Flutie Jr. Autism Foundation, in honor of his son Doug Jr. who lives with Autism.

Being a Canadian, we were honored to have that Boston College guy play in the CFL for so many years. He worked magic week in and week out in the Great White North, was a special citizen contributing to community causes, his family, and to his charitable goals.

Doug Flutie is one of those special guys that comes around too rarely. With so many athletes finding trouble and being what really is the opposite of a role model, Doug remains, truly a role model for how to make a difference in this world. Doing more for the causes that matter.

In the same ceremony, none other than Andre Agassi is honored for his charitable work with the Andre Agassi foundation, raising over $75 million to date. He spoke some very wise words tonight, (paraphrasing) "If you care, you do.", you act on it! We can all take these words more seriously to make a difference in this world. If you care, you do.

Tennis is a game that we love and are passionate about, but it is still just a game. We hit a yellow ball back and forth. Sure it's fun, but maybe if we can all be as passionate about some more important things in life, like making a difference, the world can be a better place.

MarkOskar

10 Reasons to Attend the 2009 U.S. Open

2009-08-30T08:21:00.002-04:00

The 2009 U.S. Open presented by the United States Tennis Association is THE showcase event for Tennis in North America. Running August 31st, to September 13 in New York City, you'll have an opportunity to watch the worlds top Tennis athletes vying for the final slam of the season. No, I'm not being paid by the U.S.T.A, but I certainly sound like it!

I've attended the Open twice now, travelling from Toronto, Ontario to New York with my wife. It's about a nine hour drive from our house, but worth every second we spend in that fabulous village named New York. Our first year, we had the pleasure of watching Federer take out Agassi in the finals. It was a 90-10 crowd split in favor of Agassi, however my wife and I remained loyal Federer fans and tried to voice support despite the pro-Agassi crowd. Our second year, we tried something different and toured the outside courts and stands enjoying a thrilling Davenport victory, a Safin victory, a Davydenko grudge match, and a spattering of other wars.

There are many reasons to attend the U.S. Open, and we all know there are many excuses not to attend (T.V., money, distance...etc...).

I think you should attend though, and now (finally?) I'll present to you the top ten reasons to attend the 2009 U.S. Open:

Stay, dine, and party in Manhattan...There are few cities in the world that can compete with Manhattan in this area.
Mens depth - The depth of the mens game right now is ultra-strong, pick a day and there's a good chance you'll watch something special.
Williams sisters - If you aren't a fan, become one now. It's New York, they have oodles of slams between them, and they love a New York night.
Comebacks and Retirements - Kim Clijsters, and Sharapova are back, while Marat Safin is taking off. Kim was missed by the hardcore fan, Sharapova was missed by the casual, while Safin will be missed by everyone with a sense of humor and a eye for sickening talent.
Food - The food is overpriced and mediocre, but time flies sitting in the eating areas watching the fans go by. The U.S. Open is a fantastic place to simply people watch.
Roger Federer - He's playing well, he's officially a living legend, and the guy isn't going to be playing forever. If you haven't watched him live (and at the Open), do it. I was at times, mesmerized watching him dismantle Agassi in that final.
Elena Dementieva - She dominated Serena despite a loss at Wimbledon. She then again dominated her in Toronto in a victory, and Elena is one of very few who can not only match Serena in physical fortitude, but also surpass her. There's another Alpha out there folks.
The Stars - Not only can you get up close to Tennis stars, particularly in the practice areas as they come and go, but you'll see the likes of Matthew Perry, Donald Trump...etc...should you be lucky enough.
The Night Match - No where in the world, at any time will you be able to find yourself amongst 20,000 screaming fans, under the lights, cheering on your favorite tennis star at the top of your lungs...and it be considered normal. You just can't describe what that New York air does to a Tennis fan, it's remarkable, and a remarkable feeling.
The Grudge Match - While we can certainly see this with the women, I'm speaking particularly about the men here. Day or night, first or second week, go find a match that appears to be heading into a five set war. These are serious athletes, with serious talent, and a mental toughness that is unmistakable. It's inspiring to watch someone draw deep into the third (or fourth) hour of a match, fighting for their life trying to win that battle. Watch their expressions, their feet, and even the crowd around you. You'll only find this at a slam, and it's the only one in North America.

Now get in your car! ;)

MarkOskar

U.S. Open Mens Draw: Bottom Half Excitement!

2009-08-28T20:29:00.005-04:00

Well, if the top half of the 2009 U.S. Open mens draw will be predictable, then the bottom half surely should have more excitement, shouldn't it? Shouldn't it? You are in luck my friend. Everything and more is located in the bottom half.

Here in the bottom half, you have super-stars such as Del Potro, Nadal, and Murray. Then you have a whole host of quality top-25 (or close to it) players, many of whom can be quite dangerous. Included in that list are, big bad Ivo, who will certainly play Murray in round number three, if Murray conquors that Latvian kid (Gulbis) in round one. You have the other Swiss - Wawrinka, the best young kid today in Cilic, Frenchman Gilles Simon, Ferrero (taking on Santoro in a no-holds barred cage match to the death in round one), Semi-Captain America with Mardy Fish, and of course, everyone's favorite Dark Horse, Marat Safin.

If only Marat could "check back in" for just one more tournament before he kisses this tennis world good-bye. Don't count on it, but wouldn't it be something? He has Del Potro in round 2, so seriously, don't bet on it.

All the players I just mentioned alone prove better than the entire top half of the draw, and I've actually only mentioned one quarter of it thus far (exception Nadal). In Nadal's quarter, there is plenty of eye-balling to go around here.

Nadal, Tsonga, Berdych, Monfils, and crazy-man Fernando Gonzalez. Whoops, there's also Gasquet taking on Nadal in the first round, and David Ferrer who will hang around for a couple of rounds.

The bottom half of the mens side will be one heck of a party, with a couple of great first round matches, some quality dark horses, and super stars (who are playing well) galore.

How do you pick the guys coming out of each quarter? Toss the coin my friend, toss the coin. Nadal isn't 100%, Tsonga recently walloped Federer, and Monfils could be quite dangerous. Monfils will surely keep crowds alive, and on his side.

The bottom half is a fun place to be, but only as a spectator. Murray, Del Potro, Nadal, Tsonga, and Monfils, my top picks...Will have their work cut out for them if they want to meet Federer who will have one soft draw in the finals.

Enjoy the games!
MarkOskar

U.S. Open Mens Draw: Top Half is Predictable

2009-08-27T20:02:00.004-04:00

Well the draw is finally out for the final slam of the year, and yes, Roger and Rafa are on opposite ends of the draw (phew!).

Let's have a quick look at the first half of the men's draw, featuring Roger Federer.

Well, Roger has absolutely no one to note of in the first two rounds of play, however will have a lurking Lleyton Hewitt in round three. Sure, Lleyton is playing decent and has added even more depth to the tennis world, but this even more than Wimbledon is Roger's home. Expect a battle in round three with Federer prevailing in three or four sets.

As we go down the quarter we have more non-threats to Roger and then enter James Blake, Tommy Robredo, Robin Soderling, and at the bottom Davydenko. Folks, this may be one of the easier quarters that Roger has ever seen, nevermind he's playing super tennis right now.

Take Blake, the guy is on home turf but has zero momentum and is playing in a lost season.
Soderling? While I am a big fan of his style and personality, the guy is like o-fer eight million against Federer? How about Davydenko...Well, I'm personally expecting Soderling to beat Davydenko and ultimately become Roger's quarter exit hurdle.

This is simply the softest half of the draw, and if I were Federer, I'd be breathing a sigh of relief.
Roger isn't playing to make the quarters though, and the second half of the draw gets a little more interesting. Roddick and Djokovic are the headliners here, with John Isner a dark horse, and a notable seed listing of Verdasco, Haas, and Stepanek.

Roddick and Haas could be a good battle later in the quarter, and of course to exit the quarter, Roddick and Djokovic. That could be a thriller, but my bet goes to Andy in front of the home crowd. He's a New York kind of kid, it'll play into his hands.

Outside of some of these notable match-ups, in all honesty, I'm a bit disapointed in the spread of players. I dont know, is Benjamin Becker and Verdasco a great round one match-up? I suppose Isner and Hanescu should be at least interesting to stay tuned to. I can't even call a "great" round one match-up in Federer's quarter.

I'm expecting to write about much more excitement happening in the second half of the draw. Thank goodness, because I'm not stoked about the first half.

MarkOskar

Nadal's Year and Future Riding on U.S. Open

2009-08-25T20:00:00.004-04:00

No one will deny that Rafael Nadal has had a difficult year thus far.
He won the Australian Open at the start of the season, continuing a magical run through the 2008 season, however that seems like a decade ago now (doesn't it?). Beyond the Australian Open and leading up to the French, Nadal was simply being "Nadal". Winning five titles out of ten tries, and making people wonder if Federer was ever going to get a beat back on the Spaniard.

Things changed drastically however one sunny afternoon in Madrid, when Federer looking more like his usual self drilled Nadal in the final 6-4, 6-3. The round before, Nadal in spectacular fashion barely managed to get through Djokovic in what will end up being one of the better 2009 non-slam matches of the year.

With that loss, Nadal walked into the French Open with reduced momentum, an apparent knee issue, and some personal family related issues. Of course, those personal issues didn't surface all of a sudden, but that is none of our business, and we'll leave it at that.

At Nadal's legendary backyard (Rolland Garros), people refused to believe that the master of clay could lose. Why? Because he hadn't lost at the French Open. He was virtually unbeatable going into the 2009 French Open, that is, until some Swedish rebel played the match of his life and dismantled the Spaniard in legendary fashion. It was the upset of all upsets at the French, and while we didn't witness "Roger-like tears" from Nadal, it had to of hurt...Badly.

Nadal then went into an injury time-out and only just returned to the competitive scene via the Montreal Masters. He went on to lose to Del Potro in the quarters, and then his #2 ranking to Andy Murray. No coincedence that he lost to a future top #3 player, and then his ranking to quite possibly the next #1 player in the world.

It has indeed been a difficult year for Nadal, however here he has an opportunity to fight like hell in a city where fighting like hell earns you respect and honor. New York will get behind the underdog and Rafa can use this to his advantage to slide through the first week and deep into the second. He is however not the #1 seed, or even the #2 seed here, he's #3. How the draw plays out for him will be revealed very shortly, and he may need some ol' "luck of the draw" on his side.

Anything shy of the semi-finals in my mind though is going to be tough for Rafa. He MUST play up to his seed in order to walk away here with anything positive. Yes, I know he is just returning from a significant injury, but this isn't Roger Federer. Nadal has a significantly smaller window of opportunity to haul majors because he plays like no other man out there, with sheer reckless abandon. His body won't survive into his 30's, he has maybe 3-4 years (if lucky) before either a) The body says good-night; or b) Del Potro, Murray and the rest of the upstarts take over tennis for good.

I also believe anything other than Rafa or Roger winning the U.S. Open will be an added hurdle for Rafael to overcome. Federer wins (no matter what happens to Nadal), and he has to feel some comfort that the universe that he knows still holds somewhat true. Throw in Murray, Tsonga, Del Potro, Roddick, or anyone else, and things change. The universe changes (again). More guys, with more confidence. Deeper draws, tighter rankings, and ultimately improved competition for Nadal to deal with.

The 2009 edition of the U.S. Open could truly be a legendary tournament with so many men legitimately having a shot here. The field is so deep these days, with so many story lines, so many characters.

It's getting close folks, if you are less than ten hours away from New York, you had better start planning the road trip now!

Cheers,
MarkOskar

Federer, Dementieva Primed for U.S. Open

2009-08-23T20:46:00.004-04:00

Rocket Roger Federer dispatched Novak Djokovic with relative ease, despite a second set hiccup going down a break to take the Cinci Masters and solidifying his place atop the rankings and as the man to beat in New York.

Meanwhile, in Toronto, Elena Dementieva captured the Rogers Cup event taking down Maria Sharapova in straight sets, 6-4, 6-3. In an all Russian final, Dementieva used her tight ground strokes and savvy play to ruin Maria's first title since return from shoulder injury. A nice little stat here, the last three Rogers Cup winners have gone on to win the U.S. Open. So does this mean Elena is a shoe-in for the slam? Well, it certainly makes her a top contender (she was anyway), but as we all say...Don't count Serena out when we're talking about a slam. What about Sharapova anyway? This is great stuff from one of the faces of womens tennis and we can (almost) guarantee a spot for her in the final 8, provided her draw isn't brutal.

Back to the men, with Djokovic making a final here, the final four at the U.S. Open will be an intriguing bag of guess-work. Murray, Djoker, Del Potro, Roddick, Nadal, Federer, and a host of others are going to make for an awesome event that could generate some real classic matches for future rain-delay broadcasts.

You can bank on Federer heading into the semis to continue his streak, but will Nadal be an odd man out here? I'm a bit worried that things aren't where they should be with the U.S. Open so close, but at slams, things have a way of working themselves out, don't they?

So the anticipation continues to build for the U.S. Open and tennis is surely on a fantastic upswing on both the women and men sides of the draw. I can't wait for this final slam of the year!

Cheers,
MarkOskar

Maria Sharapova & Elena Dementieva: Russian Love in Toronto

2009-08-23T08:39:00.003-04:00

The finals are set after an inspiring 3 set victory from Maria Sharapova over Klaybanova, 6-2, 4-6, 6-4 in front of a packed Toronto house at the Rogers Cup.

With that victory, we are treated to an all Russian final of Sharapova vs Elena Dementieva.
This is Sharapova's first final since returning to tennis after a shoulder injury that sidelined her for some time. Maria will be pumped for this and the timing couldn't possibly be better. With only a couple of weeks to the U.S. Open, players want to start getting in the groove ready to peak in New York.

This is going to be a dog-fight though today, Dementieva is a grinder as Sharapova puts it. After getting revenge on Serena Williams from that Wimbledon loss, she is also going to be pumped, and sitting on a surplus of confidence. Her groundstrokes will bite today and Maria is going to have to hit a lot of balls if she wants to find success.

Expect a classic today, and a win-win for tennis. Each player has a story, and each player is a deserving champion. Let's just see who can grind it out!

MarkOskar

Cinci Masters: Djokovic Ravages Nadal

2009-08-22T21:06:00.005-04:00

There we have it.
Is Nadal not back in form, or did Novak Djokovic stick it to Nadal?
Let's just say a little from column A, and a little from column B...

Novak Djokovic certainly surprised me to essentially win in routine manner against Rafa to set-up a final against Roger Federer in Cinci.

Novak played the return of serve game much better than Nadal did taking 3 of 6 break opportunities, and winning more than 50% of the points in which a 2nd serve was played.
When you can't manage your serve, you are going to run into big, big problems. This is what plagued Nadal this evening.

Is this a severe stumble for Nadal? No.
Can this plant a seed of negativity in Rafa however? Yep, and it will.
His return to tennis has been semi-successful thus far, but two losses pre-final while Federer strolls into the final here will give Nadal something to think about.

Furthermore, the mens game is certainly evolving, and fast. Murray is confident (despite his loss to Roger today), Del Potro is confident (despite him just being exhausted), Roddick will show up in New York, Tsonga will stride, and now Novak will surely hold a stronger flame.

It may not be what Nadal feels out there, it what the OTHER players are feeling.
I'm stirring the pot a little bit here, but Rafa may not be "Rafa" for some time here.
Injury, family issues, and rust may be a larger obstacle than we acknowledging.

Let's hope the lad gets his game together quickly.

MarkOskar

Dementieva Dumps Serena Willams: This was Coming!

2009-08-22T18:23:00.003-04:00

When Elena Dementieva lost that absolutely super Wimbledon match against Serena Williams earlier this year I thought; Wow, Elena is capable of not only beating Serena, she's capable of dominating Serena.

Here we are several months later and while Dementieva didn't exactly dominate Serena, she certainly made her point. The Russian will not be intimidated by Serena, and if anyone will be doing the imtimidation...It'll be Elena. With that we had a 7-6, 6-1 victory by the Russian, and Serena is sent packing.

Remember that powder puff serve of years gone by? Well, it's not exactly Venus material, but Elena has made strides there. Her physical fitness is on a different level, and her physical intimidation is also up at least one notch. I'm really impressed with the evolution of this player.
The sky is the limit here for Dementieva.

Should Sharapova advance into the finals of Toronto, we are going to have an all-Russian treat on our hands.

Who to bet on? I'll take Elena Dementieva in two dominating sets.
She's that good right now.

MarkOskar

Paradorn Srichaphan: How's the Wrist?

2009-08-22T12:00:00.006-04:00

The former top 10 player, Paradorn Srichaphan is apparently still looking to return to tennis after leaving tennis more than 2 years ago due to a wrist injury.

Wildly popular in Asia, the Thai player was a promising player with character and game. A serious wrist injury however stalled Paradorn's career in 2007 and he hasn't played a tournament since.

Most have written him off after he married a former Miss Universe, headed into Asian television, and opened an Italian restaurant. What more does this guy need? Well apparently he still needs the competitive tennis world. Paradorn is 30 though now, he's not getting any younger, and the top 10 is ultra deep. Sure he has protected ranking, but could a 30 year old come back with this ladder of pros and make a dent? Maybe, but probably not. Too bad, because Paradorn was good for tennis, good for tennis in Asia, and fun to watch on court. The tennis world is moving fast though, we are in a period of evolution and super talent. Paradorn may be in for a surprise upon his return, and struggle to see top 30.

This is of course assuming he actually does come back to competitive tennis...Which I'm not going to rest any chips on.

MarkOskar

Roger Federer and Andy Murray: Rumble in the Cinci Jungle

2009-08-22T08:59:00.004-04:00

Anyone want to catch a fight this afternoon?
How about the King vs. the possible Heir to his thrown?
Oh baby, if we want to watch something special this afternoon, look no further than Andy Murray, the #2 player in the world, taking on the face of tennis, world #1, Roger Federer.

With no disrespect to Rafa, I will bank on Andy holding the #1 position longer than Nadal can potentially. Andy has a game that will last longer (in years) and the guy is on the freight train of physical and mental improvement. Is Andy in peak physical condition? Check. Does the guy have confidence to burn? Check. How about mental toughness? Check. An all-around game which is capable of evolving in a tough match? Double check.

The semifinal between Andy and Roger is going to be another glimpse of the future, but I'd be silly to put this many chips into the Scot this afternoon. Roger took a "just returning to the game" loss to Tsonga in Montrael, but otherwise has looked great returning. He's still the favorite going into the U.S. Open, and I'd still consider him the man to beat today.

On the other side, we have Nadal squaring off against Novak Djokovic. Will Rafa throttle Novak? Will Djokovic come prepared and play to his potential (which he hasn't in the immediate past)? I don't know what to make of this one. Anything can happen out there, but I wouldn't be surprised if we DON'T see a repeat of Novak's courageous effort from Madrid. I could be wrong, but I'm just not seeing that right now.

This however is another can't lose final for Cinci on Sunday. You have the four top ranked players all shooting for a berth in the final today, and when that happens, fans get bang for their buck.

Enjoy!
MarkOskar

Rogers Cup Tennis: Super Semis Set, eh?!

2009-08-22T08:38:00.003-04:00

Host city Toronto couldn't have asked for a better Semifinal match-up between Serena Williams and Elena Dementieva. The match-up taking place this afternoon could easily be the match of the tournament if memories of their Wimbledon clash are able to wash ashore today.

Serena, doing this without her sister Venus who crashed out early is looking strong in Toronto. She needs to be, the U.S. Open is only weeks away and the Toronto/Montreal/Cinci week for women and men signals your final preparations before the last major of the year. This could be a great clash of the titans today. Elena who is serving better, is a superior physical player from her former self can keep up with Serena. In fact, when she's on, she one of the few who can actually dominate Serena physically. It doesn't always happen, but I'm banking on a strong Dementieva today to give Serena all she can handle. Expect three sets of fun.

The other side has the surprise Klaybanova taking on Maria Sharapova, our favorite on-court screamer. I missed out on Klaybanova's gruelling victory over Jankovic in the previous round, so I can't give too much on her...Sharapova on the other hand has been televised here in Toronoto regularly...In my mind, she clearly has some improvement to return to her old self, but she's looking strong, yelling even stronger, and has showed more guts over the past few months than I honestly thought she had. Sharapova should prevail here, which will make for an entertaining final no matter who prevails between Williams and Dementieva.

Tennis Canada can put on a smile this year after hosting a brilliant men's event in Montreal, shattering one week ticket sales record (for ANY event), and having one of the best draw development of any tournament in 2009. The women's side has held its own as well and that's great for the future of tennis in Canada.

Enjoy the tennis today!
MarkOskar

The Tennis News Authority Returns!

2009-08-22T08:13:00.004-04:00

It's been some time since I logged a real blog entry and I couldn't have taken a "vacation" from this world at a worse time. The tennis world is on fire, plots are thickening, and both the women and men are enjoying a very interesting summer!

Why did TTNA take time off?

Well, it was a busy spring planning a wedding and finally getting married to my long time girlfriend. All the while, I had been seeking a change from my previous employer in the financial industry as a Contract Manager into a government role managing high dollar/visability strategic procurement initiatives which opens up (even more) doors for me. I finally received an offer and made the change. The changes along with a generally busy summer mixing business and pleasure (a lot of golf), moved some priorities a bit lower, and unfortunately this blog was one of those downgraded priorities.

Things have settled however, and I should be able to get a least 2-3 posts out a week, and will make every effort to live up to that goal!

Will return with some tennis oriented commentary shortly! ;)

MarkOskar

TTNA on Vacation (Still): Returning August 4th, 2009

2009-07-30T18:27:00.002-04:00

I've neglected the Tennis blog because I've been on vacation. Returning with vigor on Tuesday August 4th.

Have a great weekend!

MarkOskar

10 Tennis Players to Watch this Hardcourt Season

2009-07-24T07:43:00.004-04:00

With the hard court season essentially upon us, let's have a look at who we should be watching this leg of the season and into the mighty U.S. Open in September. There are story lines everywhere in the tennis world and we could be in for a treat of a final Grand Slam in 2009.

Rafael Nadal: The obvious #1 choice here. He'll be back in August at the Montreal (Masters) event and it will be very interesting to see how the lad comes back to competitive play. Will Nadal have the 5th gear in his pocket which makes him oh-so difficult to play against? Will foes carry more confidence after his French Open defeat (ala Mike Tyson after Buster Douglas)? While I don't think anyone can really expect the title for Nadal in Montreal, I'm thinking he goes deep and impresses many.
Roger Federer: Perhaps the arguable #2 choice. He's on a high, re-claiming Wimbledon and of course his 1st French Open title. Mirka just gave birth to two twin girls and his life is seemingly fit for a king (or perhaps only a king could dream). Can he end the year with 16 slams? Can he put a new strangle hold on the #1 ranking? Will the guy ever break a sweat again? hehe.
Del Potro: He ran into a hot Lleyton Hewitt at Wimbledon and ended his hopes quite early, but this set-back won't stop the big guy from running amok of the draws he enters. Del Potro is still primed for the big time, and the hard courts should treat him well this summer. Beware everyone!
Andy Murray: He couldn't live up to Wimbledon hype drowning to Roddick is one of Roddicks's career highlight matches. Don't blame Andy (Murray) however, the guy is the true #3 in the world and could very well run into the U.S. Open final again. I can't wait to see the draw and where players are spotted.
Andy Roddick: He's not playing right now because his body just isn't 100%. Good on him, take a breather after the match of your life Andy! He lost what will be the biggest match of his life (even if he wins a slam again), but the guy won the admiration and respect of millions around the world. IF this is the new Andy Roddick, the top of the ladder is going to get extremely crowded into 2010.
James Blake: ...And for all the wrong reasons. Will James ever bring things back into form? He has been a huge disapointment during the 2009 season, including his recent Davis Cup loss. Where does he go from here? Where does his mind sit? When you are spiraling this badly, it's extremely hard to turn things around. This hard court season though can give an opportunity to Blake to stop the bleeding. Please, make it stop!!!
Kim Clijsters: The classy former #1 has been given a wildcard into the U.S. Open, and while no one expects huge results, it'll just be great to watch her on court again. Television better get her matches shown. She was/is a great competitor, and truly a benefit to the game.
Maria Sharapova: This is it Maria! NOW is your time to start making tracks out there. You've had your time to get into competitive shape, see the tour up close, and work out the kinks. I'm expecting big things from the Russian this quarter of the season, she needs to start making runs at the big guns.
Dinara Safina: While her brother runs from the tour (almost), Dinara has to stare the tour in the face and say "Eff you all...". If "This is it!" for Maria, then this is REALLY it for Dinara. Any disapointments will make her a punchline for #1 tennis. Dinara must take titles, but preferably the U.S. Open. It's possible, but I unfortunately just don't see it.
Elena Dementieva: I saw something in her during the Serena Williams Wimbledon match that I just haven't seen from anyone fighting Venus or Serena. It was inspiring tennis, it was back in your face tennis, and Elena was simply sticking it to Serena during the match...Physically and mentally. She was the dominant player, which is something that is a rarity against Serena. I'd love to see how she can follow up this summer.

Honorable mention:

Serena Williams: I left her out of the top 10 because I expect her to dominate her schedule.
Richard Gasquet: Let's see how he rebounds back into the competitive tennis world. No kissing random women in clubs Dick!
Robin Soderling: He's hot right now, watch him.
U.S. Open attendance: The economy has been the story of the year, how will people be drawn to a generally expensive event with outrageous concession prices?

MarkOskar

The Robin Soderling Factor

2009-07-22T19:11:00.003-04:00

Robin Soderling, the Swede who slayed the Spanish giant in style back at the French continued his winning ways to win his home tournament in Sweden just this past week. He is now the #11 player in the world, and can continue building on things in Hamburg this week.

Head HERE, and you'll find a great article on the lad, along with some pictures of Soderling wearing a gladiator outfit (?). Interesting, don't quit your day job Robin...

Anyway, the guy has built an 18-3 record since May, utilizing his big serves, fearless groundstrokes, including a forehand that when rolling looks sick (in a good way) at times.
It wasn't there against Roger at Rolland Garros, but apparently against anyone else, Robin is a force to be considered strongly.

I've mentioned previously what I think of the guy, he's great. I was truly inspired by his destruction of Rafael Nadal (no offence to Rafa), not because I dislike Rafa, but because I think Soderling is a slightly off-center Alpha out there who has potential more because of his mindset than his big game.

At Wimbledon, Soderling went relatively deep into the 4th round, which was an encouraging display of major tournament follow-up to the French. Does anyone think the guy can win a major though?

I think at this stage of the game, the quick look says No...But I'm not so sure here. He's capable of beating any big player not named "Roger", and I think his game is there to actually slay the ultimate giant in Federer in the immediate future.

What Soderling needs to get over though is the mystique that seems to stun the lad before a point is even played...Which is odd, because that awe doesn't even remotely exist against Nadal. In fact, it appears to be the opposite, Nadal and Soderling hate each other, and that may actually be of benefit to Soderling. If only Robin could develop a disliking of Roger! Hard to do though, as we know what Roger means to the game, to the players, history, and its fans.

Robin Soderling however has a chance to move into the top 10 in near future and begin making a serious run at the top 5. Will he get there? Well that depends on who you ask, and how much this guy can continue developing mentally. He's only 24 folks, there's plenty of upside to the kid.

MarkOskar

Rafael Nadal's Window of Opportunity

2009-07-21T17:11:00.004-04:00

Rafa Nadal will be back soon from the knee injury that has sidelined the Spaniard since his French Open loss to recent Swedish Open champion Robin Soderling. Great news for tenns, "no"?...But how long will we get to marvel at Rafa's speed, quickness, defense, character, and heavy (heavy) topspin?

The kid is still just 23 years old, but has hauled in over 30 tour titles including all Grand Slams except the U.S. Open. He plays a lot, his game is brash, hard on ankles and knees, and what makes Rafa, RAFA, may ultimately cut his career short.

With barely 4-5 years in the upper echelons of the Tour, Rafa is already walking a plank that I don't think he can even turn around on. His body is wearing, his knees are really wearing, and Rafa will risk making some choices in the relatively near future.

Reduce the schedule? Sure, a great option that most people agree should work with Rafa, however how does this affect his game? Can Rafa just turn things on after extended breaks...Taking place more frequently? Will his ranking suffer enough to drop him in the 3-4 or dare I say 5 spot in the longer term future? Assuming Roger can't win everything, will victories by other stars build their confidence enough to catch-up to the Federer-Nadal dominance?

Can Rafa make slight enough changes to make his game more efficient on his body, but remain biting and effective on his opponent? Sure he can, but it ain't gonna happen. Rafa's game is warrior-like. It's part of who he is, and I don't think he'll change it for the world.

With tour demands, a tough game on the body, and now knees that are officially wearing, Rafa may not have much time to bring in many more slams. I give Rafa to age 26 tops to be who Rafa is today. By then, I wouldn't be surprised if knee issues (or other serious issues) become significant and career changing. By 26, this newer generation (Murray, Del Potro...etc...) will also be in full flight, and I'm just not sure Rafa will be able to maintain dominance at 90%.

3 Years Rafa, this is what you have. Win the U.S. Open, take as many French Opens as you can, and sail into the night as a Hall of Famer with 10+ slams, a career grand slam, and a legendary character and fight.

You heard it hear first.

MarkOskar

Tiger Woods Missing Cut at British Open Provides More Legend to Federer

2009-07-17T18:59:00.004-04:00

Tiger Woods has crashed out of the British Open this afternoon, playing a miserable round and will now go home before the weekend, missing the cut, and wondering what went wrong.
It's got to be difficult being the best golfer in the world, and not giving yourself a shot to win a Major.

My question here though is - What is Tiger's missed cut the equivalent to at a Tennis major?

My initial thought would be a Quarterfinal loss because there are two rounds played afterward, just as there are in golf. But this seems somewhat forgiving here, I'm going to call is a Round of 16 loss (Although I think still it could be worse).

So Tiger Woods bowed out of the British Open today in the "Round of 16", and will continue to stand on his 14 Majors.

Meanwhile, at Wimbledon, Roger Federer reached his 21st Grand Slam Semifinal. He reached the Semifinals or better 21 times out of the last 21 tennis majors. 5 years+ of smooth, hard earned consistency.

With Tiger Woods bowing out today, Roger's record seems to even shine brighter today. It's a testament to his work ethic, body preparation, and on-court execution. It involves some luck of course keeping the body from injury, but it is what it is. He's worked through it and for the last 5 years, Roger has stood tall deep into a major.

This is a bit of nonsense with creating a cross-sport direct comparison of career accomplishments, but it does emphasize the feat that Roger has accomplished, and should add to it at the U.S Open and into 2010.

Bravo Roger!
Time for Woods to start a new streak...

MarkOskar

Is Roger Federer the Tacky One?

2009-07-15T19:13:00.004-04:00

The short answer is no.
Should whoever is clothing this guy from Nike be fired?
Absolutely!

Since a moment or two since Federer slipped on his cutely trimmed post-match attire at Wimbledon which had a "15" sewn onto it, people went into an uproar over that action. Further to that moment, a curious uproar unlike previous years has been thrown at Federer's fashion choices.

While I believe Federer certainly has choice over what he wears, it's Nike who is truly in the drivers seat here. Unless Federer really has serious objections, Federer will throw on whatever garb they throw at him. Why? Federer has other cares, and in actuality, nothing the guy has worn is seriously THAT bad. Don't get me wrong, honestly, I think Roger looked like a fool with the #15 jacket, while Roddick looked like a truck ran over him over 5 feet away, but the intention to rub it in, look cocky, pretentious or anything along those lines was certainly not there.

Do you honestly believe that Roger would have requested such a move with Nike prior to the match? Should we be crucifying all of the American sports that hand over hats and t-shirts to the victorious athletes, often minutes before, they win their respective professional sport?

Federer didn't request the 15, nor did he request the clothing to be as "cute" as it attempted to be.

What is happening here is an idea gone wrong within the Nike walls. Sure, the women are a bit more fashion forward out there, but even what they are wearing is a tad much to accept. It IS getting tacky, it does diminish the sport, and someone at Nike needs to re-think this through.
The players are looking like runway models upon entrance to a court, and not the warriors they should be. They look soft, they appear distracted by the clothes they wear, and people are starting to notice.

While Roger Federer could certainly use some better judgement out there, Nike should be taking this one on the chin for what I'm thinking is pure marketing stupidity.

Nike - Quit trying too hard.

MarkOskar

Rafa Nadal's Return to Competitive Tennis

2009-07-11T09:29:00.004-04:00

Rafael Nadal appears to be circling the Montreal Masters in early August as his return to the tour. Just in time for Federer to have an expected leave from the tour to "work with" Mirka delivering their first child. It's a boy by the way ;) That is of course, just a guess, but you heard it hear first.

With what will become an increasingly anticipated return from Nadal, and the sense that there will be two new trains en route to collide with each other...Nadal will need to jump back into gear quickly and with authority.

In only the last couple of months, Nadal has lost:
1) Beloved French Open title to Federer
2) Wimbledon title to Federer - Although not available to defend
3) #1 Ranking to Federer
4) Madrid to Federer
5) Virtually all momentum, which went back to Federer
6) Possibly a family structure that he grew up with (speculation still), with his parents breaking up.
7) Any thoughts that he IS the fan favorite - This was shown against Soderling at the French ("Sod-er-ling, Sod-er-ling") and the following love-in for Federer that still hasn't stopped.

This is a lot of stuff to take and deal with. #7 may not seem significant, but what is Nadal if he can't rally his own crowd/troops against some Swede at his own tournament being the French?

Nadal's return in August will have to make its mark quickly to begin re-capturing momentum. Top 6 mix is strong, with Roddick and Murray playing particularly solid ball, and right now I'd favor a Roddick on hard court (if he keeps this up) over Nadal who is just coming back from injury and a tennis low.

Rafa will not be a favorite in Montreal, but if he can swing into the semi's or beyond, that would be an excellent return to tennis. In the unlikely event he wins the thing, then everyone take notice, and fear the Spaniard. The U.S Open, back into the Aussi Open should tell us who the true #1 is, and Nadal needs to get that back to stop this Federer train from gaining too much speed.

I hope Rafa comes back with backhands booming and feet that are flying.
Summer into fall will be extremely interesting tennis drama!

MarkOskar

Roger Federer: Now What?

2009-07-07T18:04:00.002-04:00

The master has triumphed on every surface, every major, and climbed to the top of the rankings now twice. The maestro has defeated all comers (including Nadal), and won the admiration of the legends that played before him. He had made millions, met world leaders, has adoring fans across the globe, a beautiful wife, and are expecting their first child. He has cars, million dollar homes, and countless sponsorships to keep the green flowing. And of course, in 2009, he laid claim to the greatest tennis player of all time...

So where does someone who has achieved seemingly everything in the tennis world go from here?
What does he play for? What will drive him going forward? How in the world does Federer keep his edge?

Well, it's a tough question, but here are 10 drivers for Federer moving forward:

Singles - Olympic Gold - After getting dispatched by James Blake in a unfortunate loss, Federer surely still burns to stand on the podium, alone.
Breathing Room - Sure he's got Sampras by 1 Grand Slam, but simply making 20 the goal and grinding toward it to make some distance between the field will put a GOAT stamp inked in iron, and possibly help end the Rod Laver GOAT debate.
The season Grand Slam - Is Federer capable of this at this point in his career? Probably very unlikely, but this will launch Federer into a realm of god-like proportions (although arguably he already is)
More Wimbledon's - Federer isn't the all time king on the lawns of Wimbledon, Sampras is, Federer surely still eyes this. Roger wants these lawns to truly be HIS lawns.
Playing for Federer Jr. - Can Federer win a Grand Slam title with a child old enough to "get it"? If somehow his body can stay tuned for another 5 years, then this would surely be something he'd like to accomplish.
Stomping on the "New Generation" - Del Potro and Company are the news kids on the block, why not own them too and eliminate any of their aspirations to become a GOAT?
Swiss Davis Cup Triumph - Win won for the motherland Federer!
For the Love of the Game - This actually drives Federer already, and will continue to until I believe his body simply won't go any further. Roger loves tennis, he loves his fans, he loves the crowds, the applause and the competition. The competition itself, will drive Federer to compete for years to come.
Holding onto #1 - Perhaps a short term goal...He has #1 again, why not hold onto it as long as he possibly can? It may not mean much to him anymore, but it gives his a bar to continue leaping over.
Mirka - I get the sense that Mirka loves all of "this" as much as Roger does. I mean that in a good way. She cares, she loves to see Roger's greatness shine, she believes he can do it. Well, Roger, DO IT FOR MIRKA! ;)

MarkOskar

Quality Video of Federer-Roddick: The Final Game

2009-07-05T18:57:00.002-04:00

Final game of the Roger Federer & Andy Roddick epic Wimbledon final.
Courtesy of NBC. Enjoy!

Breaking sports news video. MLB, NFL, NBA, NHL highlights and more.

Wimbledon 2009: Final Thoughts from a Super Tournament

2009-07-05T17:39:00.004-04:00

Well, Federer prevailed 16-14 (What?) in the 5th set to end Andy Roddick's Wimbledon dreams and there we have it for Wimbledon 2009. Let's wrap up this 2009 edition with a final 10 thoughts.

Federer-Nadal 2008 will remain as the best final ever, simply because it wasn't a serving competition. 2009 wasn't quite one either, but with huge ages all around, there was simply less opportunity for high quality play.
Make no mistake however, Federer-Roddick had plenty of high quality points with all kinds of creative points, drop shots, and epic baseline points. It was Roddick at his best, and Federer looking equally great.
Note to Pete Sampras - Looking good minus the shades. It's about time you invest in something new! This isn't 1998 any longer...
4 hours and 16 minutes to complete this epic battle. This is Federer's 6th Wimbledon title and 15th slam overall, finally surpassing (with Pete Sampras with the most singles men grand slam titles in the open era. Federer is the man, (arguably) the greatest of all time, and back ontop of the rankings at #1.
Props once again to Nestor/Zimonjic and the Williams sisters for their doubles titles here at Wimbledon. Nestor and Zimonjic played a solid 3rd set to get in the drivers seat, while the Williams sisters simply showed us who the best women tennis players are in the game.
I truly felt for Roddick (and still do) for taking this loss. This has got to be extremely difficult to take. After 77 games, Roddick fighting like he's never fought before...And he still ends up with nothing (but a plate). HOWEVER, when Federer graciously tried to relate with Roddick for the loss, Roddick very sarcastically yelled back "but you have 5 of those" or something...It was funny in the moment, but the camera cought him with this look, and then him shaking his head...Like he was saying in his head - "You jackass"...Honestly, Roddick, you looked like the Jackass there. Seriously, lame, and weak. I don't think it was intentional, or I'll pretend.
Johnny Mac, you are never allowed to retire behind the booth! With so many very shaky commentators waiting in the shadows, you have insight, intelligence, and pure raw tennis I.Q..
Andy Murray will be back. The bloke is getting close, and he got unlucky running into an American in Andy Roddick who was playing in my opinion, better than he ever has...Ever.
Roddick comments post-match press conference - “He just makes it real tough. You know, he was having trouble picking up my serve today for the first time ever. He just stayed the course,” “You didn't even get a sense that he was even really frustrated by it. He kind of stayed the course and just toughed it out. He gets a lot of credit for a lot of things, but not a lot of the time is how many matches he kind of digs deep and toughs out. He doesn't get a lot of credit for that because it looks easy to him a lot of the times. But he definitely stuck in there today." - I just slagged Roddick above, but this is insightful and totally honest.
It's time to start looking forward to a host of great tournaments this summer that ride into the U.S. Open! How many story lines are there to discuss going into the final slam? Many, many! :) Great news for tennis. The game is healthy, the profiles of its stars are strong, and it's continuing to strike the masses.

Have a great evening everyone.
MarkOskar

Federer - Roddick (Marathon) in Progress #6

2009-07-05T12:57:00.001-04:00

Didn't think I'd need 6 posts in-match, but here goes.
Federer is up 11-10 in the 5th, on serve, and the quality of play has not dropped an ounce.
It's right up there with the greatest finals of all time, and this honestly doesn't appear to have an end in sight. Truly a great final.

Roddick has surprised the world with pulling shots seemingly out of his ball-cap, and both men have served legendary. Federer has 40+ aces at this point!!!

NBC has to learn to get back to the match on time though :(

MarkOskar

Federer - Roddick in Progress #5

2009-07-05T12:20:00.002-04:00

Deep into the 5th set here and still the two warriors are showing no signs of slowing down. Federer is serving like he's never before, and Roddick is proving equal there.

5-4, on serve in the 5th set.
Federer hasn't even broken a sweat out there, and Roddick has composure like I've never seen out of him before. Andy has really taken things to a new level here at Wimbledon. Solid solid play from the American.

This match could be a 10-8 type final set.
Sit back and relax!

MarkOskar

Federer - Roddick in Progress #4

2009-07-05T11:54:00.003-04:00

5th set here we come!
What an effort from Roddick, especially in that last service game to dig deep and pull through.
It's 2 sets a piece and the edge has got to be with Roddick here.
He has the momentum, he's dictating more points, and still serving extremely well.

Federer is serving first however and that's a nice touch mentally for him.

This is quite the final that few expected!

MarkOskar

Federer - Roddick in Progress #3

2009-07-05T11:35:00.003-04:00

Well well well!
Roddick breaks Federer in the 3rd set and suddenly we have a match again.
Could Andy pull this one out to go to a 5th set?

The resolve and mental toughness Andy is showing here is absolutely fantastic.
I know it's Wimbledon, but it's easy to roll over a bit here, and Roddick showing none of that today. He's fighting hard to the end...and he has a real shot at bringing this to a 5th set.

I'm worried for Federer is this does go 5 sets...Based on his history of course.

MarkOskar

Federer - Roddick in Progress #2

2009-07-05T11:21:00.002-04:00

Federer works his stuff in tie break #2 and he's now officially in the drivers seat. Roddick will have a small mountain to climb here and he knows it.

Down 2 sets to 1, Roddick will give up his first break of serve in this set...If he doesn't, man, I have some new found respect for Roddick's resolve!

Should be an interesting 4th set!

MarkOskar

Federer - Roddick in Progress

2009-07-05T10:59:00.002-04:00

Roddick may be having nightmares about the 2nd set tie-breaker for some time into the future.

With almost the match in his back pocket going up 2 sets to love, Federer came back down 4 points in the breaker to take the second 7-6 and even the match at a set a piece.

Roddick hasn't fallen apart here and is showing some serious mental toughness in the 3rd to keep things on serve, and this 3rd is on a collision course to find another tie-break.

Should be interesting.

MarkOskar

Wimbledon 2009: Mens Final and Doubles Round-Up

2009-07-05T06:49:00.003-04:00

Back to the 10 thoughts format for our final day at Wimbledon.

Venus and Serena capture the Ladies Doubles Title yesterday afternoon at the All-England Club, dispatching Sam Stosur and Renee Stubbs in 2 sets against a near capacity crowd. Talk about a memorable day for the sisters. Congratulations to them, and further proof that they are the best female players in the game today.
How does it feel to be Safina this morning? Eveyone (including me) has essentially crowned Serena as the true #1 player in the world, but you got to feel for the girl. It's not Safina's fault, she didn't really have a bad tournament, and she must feel she is getting thrown to the dogs.
Nestor and Zimonjic defend their Wimbledon doubles title by defeating the Bryan Brothers (I called this at the start of the event). Congratulations to the other "true #1" pair. Zimonjic in particular played super tennis, especially in the 3rd set. He was a man on fire during the breaker and compliments the team quite well. Another near or at-capacity crowd on hand for this one which was great to see.
What is going through Andy Roddick's head this morning? 2 hours before the match starts, nerves have got to be setting in. Andy has an absolutely brutal head to head against Federer (2-18) and he'll be fighting a dominant player, probably the crowd, and history. Tough set to beat.
How does Federer approach this one? Roger typically has little issue with Roddick, especially at Wimbledon, however mentally, he really has his work cut out for him today. This is IT! Win, and the career slam record is his, immortality, no equal, the ultimate king of tennis. It won't be easy staying mentally focused here today for Roger.
Roger is great in interviews, but as no one likes to really say - He can get a bit cocky ("Yeah, I have been so dominant", "It's really an amazing record isn't it"...etc...I say this in good fun, but I can't wait to hear his comments should he win this afternoon over the course of the next couple of weeks. While 99% should be perfectly acceptable, there will be that 1% which brings laughter to me, "Ya you know, I am the best ever" or along those lines. Roger, remember - It's ok for others to say.
Bud Collins simply isn't around enough any longer. We need more Bud Collins, the world needs more Bud Collins!
Speaking of what we need (and don't); Please Brad (Gilbert) and Pam (Shriver), make it stop...Make it stop.
Love how the new center court roof looks, however it has given everyone a bit of a chuckle in 2009. Hundreds of millions of dollars worth of engineering to combat an hour or so of rain. :)
Check out the Wimbledon online store here, find the Polo section and check out the prices. Anyone game for a 95pound collared shirt? Wow. The U.S Open, which has historically also sold the same Polo gear looks like a bargain house compared to this attempt at highway robbery. Shame on you Wimbledon! Shame, shame, shame.

MarkOskar

Roger Federer: NetJets Commercial - Instant Classic

2009-07-04T12:54:00.003-04:00

NetJets commercial created shortly after his French Open victory.
Classic...

TTNA Virtua Tennis 2009 Review: Xbox 360

2009-07-04T11:31:00.004-04:00

For those of you familiar with this series, Virtua Tennis has been a staple in your gaming catalogue for solid arcade based tennis. It certainly isn't a simulation, however it isn't purely arcade, it's somewhere in the middle, however leaning slightly toward the arcade side of things.

Virtua Tennis 2009 has picked up where the previous version left off.
By that I mean, almost to a tee, and that's a bad thing.

What you get in 2009 appears to be nothing more than a slight modification of the previous with some basic changes in World Tour, Arcade games, Online play, and the tennis itself.

Hmmmm, am I sure about this? The tennis actually plays identical, with no major changes to the tennis itself. This is a good and bad thing. It works, it's playable, and it's fun...But if you've played this before, there really isn't a huge reason to go out and buy this. That is a downer.

With Grand Slam Tennis out in stores, Virtua Tennis 2009 will certainly get demoted to the #2 slot simply because it lacks anything new. Sure there are some new characters to play with, but then I can go on to tell you how lame some of them look.

I rented this title for about a week to give it a go, and while I meddled in creating my character and going out to start my career, I also tried going online to battle people virtually around the world. WOW! That was a mistake.

Lag, lag, lag...For some reason, this game, and this game alone suffers major online lag issues. In tennis, timing is everything, and lag is amplified horribly in this game when it rears its ugly head. Unfortunately it was present far to often, making the match truly un-enjoyable.

I really can't recommend this title to anyone, unless you are entirely new to the Virtua Tennis franchise, and even then, it's a "proceed with caution".

6 out of 10.

Wimbledon 2009: Doubles Finals Will be a Classic

2009-07-04T10:51:00.003-04:00

The Bryan Brothers are the #1 team in tennis.
Nestor and Zimonjic are #2.
The Bryans regained #1 after dethroning Mr.Nestor from the #1 position.
Nestor-Zimonjic hold a 5-3 lead over the brothers in head to head match-ups.

The Bryan's and of course Nestor (with relatively new partner) are easily the most decorated and accomplished doubles pairs in mens tennis. They own all of the titles, including Olympic Gold between the 4 and are still going very, very strong.

Nestor is the defending doubles champion and recently achieved career Golden Slam.
The rivalry is firm, and continues to grow with Nestor-Zimonjic taking the last two meetings.

If you fancy watching a game of weekend tennis folks...Don't head to your local club to watch some hacks play on the front court. Watch this one. This is guaranteed to be high quality doubles tennis with the undisputed best 4 doubles players in the world about to tee it up out there.

Enjoy the tennis!
MarkOskar

Wimbledon 2009: Serena Captures 3rd Wimby Title

2009-07-04T10:31:00.003-04:00

11 Majors, 3 of them from the lawns of the All-England Club. 11-10 career record against arguably the "other" top woman of this generation.

Serena Williams is without a doubt, the best woman in tennis. She showed it today, and especially showed it in her classic semifinal bout against Elena Dementieva.

The two sisters now hold 18 majors between them, with little sign of slowing down. They are dominating, they are the alphas, and the rest are seemingly a level lower than these two.

Bloggers, news-types, and others have criticized both Venus and Serena over the years for holding tennis as almost a hobby, playing only when they have to, and committing to the minimum tournaments. However just this may be what allows these two (especially Serena) to play for years to come without their bodies breaking down (see Rafael Nadal).

Serena plays brash tennis. It's tough on her body and has to be tough on her knees. Her body type only exaggerates this even further.

If I were Serena Williams, I would consider playing even less at this point, focusing on Majors and romping the competition when it really matters in tennis.

Where will these two stop? I see 25 majors between the two as an easy target.
Did I mention they will be back out there in a few hours competing together for the doubles crown as well?

They are the best out there today folks. Give them a break and enjoy their styles.

MarkOskar

Wimbledon 2009: Serena and Venus Slugging in Final

2009-07-04T09:54:00.004-04:00

This is a high quality slug-fest in progress with Serena taking the first set 7-6.
The crowd is awkwardly quiet, however the ladies on center court are certainly not.
I've been compelled to shut my windows here because the shrieking is so loud this morning on the television (Heh)! But make no mistake, these two are clearly showing why they are truly the 2 best female tennis players in the world.

I chuckle at the thought of Ana, or Jankovic trying to match up with this. It's just not the same.
Not even close.

Serena has set #1 and we move into the 2nd set.

Enjoy the remaining match!
MarkOskar

Andy Roddick Interview: After Getting Destroyed by Federer in 2007 Aussi Open

2009-07-03T14:14:00.005-04:00

Classic Andy Roddick interview from 2007 after getting pulverized by Federer at the 2008 Australian Open. Let's hope Roddick will have something more positive to reflect on this time around. Enjoy!

MarkOskar

Wimbledon 2009: It's Roddick & Federer for the Title

2009-07-03T13:52:00.004-04:00

Well this wasn't supposed to happen?
Wasn't the story supposed to be: "Local" boy slays American to set-up dream final ???

Andy Roddick played solid tennis this afternoon to dispatch Andy Murray in what was a good match, not a great match, and certainly to the disapointment of the millions in the U.K. hoping for Murray to pull through.

Give Roddick lots of credit here, he served well, played his backhand great, and volleyed quite adequately as well.

Is it a curse? Murray should have been able to overcome the American. The crowd should have helped him through any obstacle the Roddick presented. It wasn't meant to be this afternoon, and Federer may have some further breathing room on Sunday, who dispatched Haas with relative ease.

Federer is no stranger to Roddick in Wimbledon finals and certainly he has his number. BUT Roddick is playing well, no one can argue this. While Roddick will pose problems to Federer, let's get serious here...Federer in 3 or 4. I'd be totally surprised if this goes the limit.

Sunday will be interesting for sure, but like many of you, a bit shocked that Andy Murray couldn't overcome this today.

Another year, another disapointment.

MarkOskar

Serena, Venus, and More on Wimbledon 2009

2009-07-03T07:23:00.004-04:00

I had actually forgot about my "10 thoughts from..." style which I started at the begining of the tournament. Let's go back to that for this wonderful Friday at Wimbledon. Today will be a huge day for tennis, and yesterday, the women proved to be just as exciting.
On to the list!

I continue to voice my displeasure with the Brad Gilbert commentary machine. He is certainly a bar above Pam Shriver's attempts, but Brad looks severely out of place here. Not his fault, just something isn't right here, and it comes across as such on the television. From his attire, his inability to sit still, his constant head nodding (at times where it doesn't even make sense), and his slightly unsure but still colourful commentary...Something is "off" here.
Serena Williams and Elena Dementieva put on an absolutely electrifying show yesterday in their semifinal tilt. That was what tennis is meant to be, it was tennis at its finest, and I'm so glad I got to watch it.
Before I get to Serena and Venus...Great show from Dementieva. This wasn't Serena bullying some fragile woman around the court. Elena rose to the occasion, and put forth herself as a physical equal to Serena, and actually had dictated play more often than not. I hope this is truly the Elena of the future, if so, watch out everyone!
So Venus Williams destroys Safina in under an hour. It wasn't even close, it wasn't even a match. This was Michael Jordan beating up on some highschool courtyard pretender. While Serena hasn't been able to follow-up with her claim to #1 over the spring, this trashing of Safina speaks volumes.
For the first time since it was a relatively new concept, I'm excited to watch Venus and Serena play their final tomorrow. They both got there with entirely different semifinal matches and I'm curious to see how the 2009 versions of the two match-up. Will Serena's legs be 100%? Who will dictate play? Is Venus the truly the Queen of Wimbledon?
Can we all agree that Ivanovic and Jankovic are pretenders? I really could care less that Ana got injured...She was/would have been throttled by Venus either way. These two girls are the ultimate luck-outs in the history of the womens tour.
Apparently 500+ folks have camped out at Wimbledon for the opportunity to queue for Andy Murray tickets. This is great, this is hype, this is Andy Murray-Mania. Today's match against Andy could be thrilling. I'm so glad that Andy is playing...Well, Andy today because of the character involved here. Roddick is good (great) for tennis, for the game, and for the fans. Pitting these two super characters together today will ensure fans get everything and more they hope for.
Speaking of Roddick, no matter what happens today, Andy has really been a great surprise in 2009. He's been in the thick of things quite a bit already, and he's going to be circled for the U.S. Open where we can all produce the American version of Andy-Mania. I'm not American (Canadian), but we're already planning a road trip to catch some of the action.
Tommy Haas and Roger Federer should be an entertaining affair filled with great points, athletisism, and intrigue. Haas is 31, and the oldest player in the field. The oldest guy is 31 years old! Jimmy Connors (U.S. Open run) - You are an absolute magician.
Like Roddick, watch Sharapova at the U.S. Open, yeah, I'm getting ahead of myself here, without Wimbledon even being done here, but I expect the swinging Russian to be pumped up, hitting the ball well, and physically (fit) 100% for Flushing Meadows.

Enjoy the semifinals!
MarkOskar

Serena Williams & Elena Dementieva: Wow, WHAT A MATCH!

2009-07-02T10:55:00.002-04:00

Short and Sweet this post will be (Busy week here).

It's 6-all in the 3rd set, and Serena and Elena are putting on a show.
This match has been absolutely fantastic!

Physically demanding, extremely high quality tennis.

If Nadal-Federer was the best mens final of all time...Simply put, this is the greatest semifinal womens match ever...Whatever the outcome may about to be.

Wow!
MarkOskar

Wimbledon 2009: Men’s Quarterfinal Action

2009-06-29T20:10:00.006-04:00

Today was a fantastic day on the courts with Murray ending the day in a thriller over Wawrinka. The week #2 draw has taken shape and here's what we have to look forward to here at the 2009 version of Wimbldeon.

Quarterfinals -

1)Hewitt vs. Roddick:

Both players have seen greater days; however both Andy and Lleyton are playing extremely well this Wimbledon and have seen good 2009 results. The serves that go boom will need to be in tact for Andy if he wants to have a chance; otherwise I’m taking Lleyton Hewitt to enter the Semifinals. I've over-simplified Roddick's chances here (The American is playing well), so could be the match of the quarterfinals. I’m picking the upset here though with Hewitt in 5.

2)Ferraro vs. Murray:

Ferraro has to try and build a storm, and sustain it (see Wawrinka), otherwise the lad is toast. I may not be giving enough credit to Ferraro, but I think Andy Murray steamrolls Ferraro in 3 sets, bringing the house to frenzy, and letting the U.K dream live on another day.

3)Haas vs. Djokovic:

Here is your other match of the quarterfinals. The resurgent German is looking mighty good these days and experience (age 31) may take this over youth. Djokovic looked solid in his victory over Sela though and we could have a grudge match on our hands. I’m picking the upset, Haas in 4 or 5. I'm clearly a softy for experience (over youth).

4)Karlovic vs. Federer:

Yeah I know big, bad Karlo hits serves that break the sound barrier, but Federer is looking hot on his home court and I expect minor trouble at best. Perhaps Federer drops a set here, but otherwise we’ll have a 7-5, 7-6, 7-5 type victory for TMF. This match may be interesting in score, but you can bet the points will be short, and the highlight reel exchanges nowhere to be found.

This was a quick post, so let me give my preliminary Semifinal picks and eventual winner forecast.

Semifinals – (Based on above forecast)

Federer vs. Haas – I like this match-up, a lot. I think Haas will prove to be a pest against Federer and it won’t be as easy as many think. Federer prevails, however in 4 tight sets, or 5 even tighter sets. This match could also be the anti-Ivo/Federer match, lots of great exchanges, athletisism, and quality play.

Murray vs. Hewitt – Another intriguing match-up, boy, do I hope my forecast comes true. Hewitt and Murray could be a classic confrontation. If this materializes, I see 5 sets of Wimbledon classic stuff. Crowd is electric, with home supporters and the ever-present Aussi crowd on hand…Players are beating each other to a pulp, with Murray prevailing in the tight points giving him a 5 set victory.

Finals – (Based on above forecast)

Federer vs. Murray – How does the home-crowd treat this one? Who do they root for? The Maestro to ink his place in history? Or the U.K. kid, to end the endless drought of futility on the lawns of Wimbledon? I’m not going to answer that, but my vision is Federer playing “perfect” as he just stated to take Murray in 4 sets. Why? I was in person at the U.S. Open final between Andre Agassi and Roger Federer. There were maybe 200 supporters of Federer with the other many thousands very vocally supporting Andre. Roger’s focus that day was Tiger Woods/Ivan Lendl-like. Solid. He’ll come up with this kind of focus again here in the finals.

Note: I was 1 of those 200 supporters for Federer that afternoon. ;)

Have fun watching an already fantastic tournament!

MarkOskar

Robin Soderling and Roger Federer: The Lone Warrior vs. The Greatest Warrior

2009-06-28T14:59:00.003-04:00

Monday is full of some fantastic match-ups, but most will be most anticipating the French Open final re-match of Robin Soderling against Roger Federer.

Folks, don't dismiss Soderling just yet. Soderling is a solid grass court player with heavy shots that will feel like you're hitting a bowling ball rather than a tennis ball. You can also bet that Soderling will feel a bit more relaxed here out of the heavy pressure that accompanied the French final for so many reasons. It was afterall, Soderling's only venture that deep in a major final. Here at Wimbledon however, this is barely week #2, and most of the pressure is long gone off of Soderling's shoulders.

What does this mean? I expect a much, much more competitive match between the two warriors. We all know that Federer is at home here, it's his court, and his rule over this tournament that makes him the man to beat, but Soderling is that unique player that you need to be extra wary of, not because he is that Djokovic-type "I want to be #1 and rule the day", but because Soderling is the warrior that walks to his own beat, neither leading or following. The guy does his own thing, plays his own game, and doesn't give a @#% who you are.

I'm intrigued by this match-up. I expect Federer to win, and want to see him surpas Sampras as the Slam king, but I also want to see Soderling slay the giant. Similar to what we see him do against Nadal at Rolland Garros. To me, that was raw competition. The real deal. Put up, or shut up tennis.

I hope tomorrow has the same style of raw, non-sugar coated tennis.
I expect it might.

Wimbledon 2009, Day 5/7: The Greatest Round of 32 Match Ever Played

2009-06-27T20:16:00.005-04:00

This was dubbed: "Haas vs. Cilic: When Worlds Collide" (it wasn't really), and when the warriors stepped on the lawn at Wimbledon, the two battle-ready gladiators fought long and hard. 2 days of lead changing, forehand pumping action. Match points lost from both players added to the drama that would become the multi-day 5th set.

In the end, resurgent German - Tommy Hass stood over his slain opponent with a 10-8 victory.
Tommy Haas, the 24th seed will move on, while Marin Cilic the 11th seed goes home to weep in sorrow and dismay.

Tommy Haas is nearing "ancient" status within the tennis world. At age 31, he should well past his prime, but recently the German has been playing some solid ball. This 4 hour and 28 minute marathon match surely should make Tommy's legs a little weak in the next round? Don't bet on it. Haas survivies because he is one physicaly fit dude. Haas isn't going to get much rest here though as he plays Sunday against Igor Andreev, the 29th seed from Russia. Assuming his body is in fact a-ok to survive the afternoon, Haas should prevail in 3-4 sets.

Keep watching Haas though, should he make week #2, he'll go on to face Novak Djokovic and I'm now thinking he could give Novak some trouble. In fact, this could be one to watch for an upset?
We'll soon find out!

Enjoy the Monday matches folks, lots of fun on tap:

Federer vs. Soderling - Re-Match of French Open Final.
Safina vs. Mauresmo - Young vs. Not Young, should be a battle.
Murray vs. Wawrinka - This test will only fire up Murray and the crowd even more!
Venus vs. Ivanovic - Bold prediction - Ana gets throttled here. It could be ugly.
Verdasco vs. Karlovic - Beauty and the Beast?
Hantuchova vs. Serena - I like this one. Serena should win, but maybe some surprise here?
Lleyton Hewitt vs. Stepanek - The Aussi keeps rolling with his flash-back magic run.

Cheers!

Wimbledon 2009: Day 4 Thoughts, Day 5 Predictions

2009-06-26T07:15:00.005-04:00

Good day fellow racqueteers.
I'm enjoying this list-type blog format I've done over the past couple of days, so I'm going to stick with it for Wimbledon. Here are 5, Day 4 thoughts, and a few thoughts at today's matches.

Day 4 (yesterday):

Should have stuck with my brain...Andy Murray foiled all attempts by Ernests to make a real match of it. I don't know where Gulbis goes from here, but 2009 is going to be a very forgetful one for the kid. He's the younger, much more European version of James Blake in terms of falling apart.
Del Potro calls his performance an "8" after getting rocketed by Lleyton Hewitt. This is a great wake-up call for Del Potro that things aren't going to come easy, and there is much more work to be done before challenging those 4 guys ahead of him. How about the "8" though? Great interview, respectful and responsible for his defeat. The other guy played better, and he knew it.
Speaking of Hewitt, this guy should now have smooth sailing until the Quarter-finals, assuming he meets Mr. Andy Roddick. This will be dubbed the "flash-back match"!
On the ladies side, all major seeds walked through with relative ease. Venus, Ana, Jelena, Caroline, Dinara...etc...While it is (to me) somewhat - "ho humm" at this point, if this continues, week 2 should be awesome with the ladies.
Samantha Stosur and Ana Ivanovic are now set to face each other - Here's your match of the day when it is scheduled.

Day 5 (today!)

I'm sorry, I don't mean to be an ass, but Pam Shriver is terrible in the booth. While sometimes quirky, her comments are awkward, at times slow (pace), and a bit homely. Her mate Brad Gilbert this morning is equally terrible. I'm not sure why, but the guy is reminding me of some older Italian chef (more diner than quality restaurant).
Speaking of Italian's, Serena is ravaging this Italian woman on Court #2 right now. Serena clearly has some improvement that need to take place before getting too deep in the draw, but she can sure look journey-women look like club-players. PS - Ok, Court #2 IS nice!
Mardy Fish and Novak Djokovic are the last players scheduled on Center Court today. Talk about another great potential match here. I for one will be rooting for Mardy all the way to have a big break-through major victory this afternoon. This is the kind of win that can turn careers around. Heart - Fish in 5, Brain - Novak in 3-4.
The big, bad Ivo is playing Tsonga this afternoon as well. This will be a great test for the man who floats like a butterfly, and stings like a bee. I've never seen these two match-up before and it should be a fun affair. Watching Ivo pump serves at dizzying speeds shouldn't frustrate Tsonga too much though. Watch the him to keep the big man moving with lots of shots behind him to keep him off balance. Tsonga in 4.
Rain is threatening this afternoon and we all know what that means! Roof Closure fun! Hurrah! It'll be 7 minutes of Wimbledon engineering awe :P

PS - Federer is about to get started as well.

MarkOskar

Wimbledon 2009, Day 3: 10 More Observations

2009-06-24T21:23:00.004-04:00

Day 3 at Wimbledon was packed with lots of interesting match-ups, results and storylines...Here's another sampling of what we saw from the All-England Club today.

Plenty of dark horses move into round #3 at Wimbledon on the mens side: Mardy Fish in a 4 set battle, Robin Soderling looking pretty good thus far, and Tommy Haas by retirement of his opponent (Llodra). Will they live to make it far in week #2? Mardy Fish will almost certainly fall against Novak Djokovic in the next round, Soderling will have to fight through Federer if he wins his next round, and Tommy Haas has a serious shot based on draw positioning.
The "Sharapova Express" de-railed a bit today, but she has far exceeded expectations since coming back from surgery. Cut the girl some slack, she'll be back and into the top 10 very soon. Her fight at the French Open more than makes up for the tough loss today.
Daniela Hantuchova beat her Zheng today in what I thought would be a tight match (the 2nd set was). Great for Daniela moving on, though she has Serena lurking if she wins her next round.
I'm still looking at Dementieva's draw positioning and continuing to think that she will slip pretty much under the radar deep into week #2 here. She really doesn't have much going on until the quarter-finals.
Wimbledon attendance has been shattering records already this year and 5-year seat plans are selling at a brisk pace! Recession what? Interesting contrast to what we saw at the French Open earlier this year (plenty of empty seats all over).
The Mighty Fed is looking solid so far giving up 18 games in 6 sets played. While I'm not going to quite commit to it, there's that "Destiny" thing that seems fitting here. 15 Slams, Wimbledon...etc...
Ernests Gulbis and Andy Murray (finally) play tomorrow in what I expect (want) to be a hotly contested battle. If you haven't had a chance to watch Gulbis play while he is on, now is your shot. Of course, the Latvian is going to have a mountain to climb against the home town boy. I'm sticking with my heart and hoping for Gulbis to shock the world, however we all know what the brain is telling us - Murray in 3.
I'm all for Wozniaki getting Centre Court love, but this will be while the #1 seed Safina is sent to Court #2? What?
I'm calling a Nestor/Zimonjic mens double title already. They bailed in the French Open, but I'm expecting the pairing to serve the lights out against the Bryan brothers in the finals.
This just in: Strawberries and Cream on sale at Wimbledon for only 15 pounds! Kidding, but I did read that the price of food is way overpriced, not very good, and generally not worth the wait/line-up. Eat at home folks!

Enjoy Wimby everyone!
MarkOskar

Wmbledon 2009, Day 2: 10 Observations

2009-06-23T19:55:00.005-04:00

Who says Del Potro can't play on grass? The 6'6" tennis playing giant may not take the entire event, but if round 1 is any indication (destruction of Clement in straight sets), then watch-out for the 5th seed. Semi-finals anyone?
Make no mistake...Venus Williams is the female to beat in 2009. Her record speaks for itself, and anyone who thinks otherwise...Is an idiot. No problems at all making it into round #2.
I was hard on Rafael Nadal, but his withdraw from Wimby may be much more complex than anyone anticipated. With the news of his parents splitting up, and Nadal being about as family oriented as anyone out there, this has got to be devastating. Best wishes to him and quick return.
This is a big, big chance for Ernests Gulbis to salvage his year. Round #2 match-up pits the once promising Latvian against crowd favorite, Andy Murray. He beat Ghedin in straight sets in round #1, and he's got a shot to get the train back on the tracks. I'm rooting for the kid here.
Speaking of Murray, how's that for Andy-Mania? This guy is draped in local papers, tabloids, the crowd clearly in his favor (big time...big time), and he's got to be feeling some serious pressure out there. The weight of a proud Kingdom on his shoulders.
Secret match of the day Wednesday: Tipsaravic vs. Mardy Fish. If they are showing any of it on T.V. try and watch some of it. I expect a good battle out there between Serbia's #2 and the American.
Match of the day for the women: Jie Zheng vs. Hantuchova. Both players are still itching to move forward in their respective careers, and you can again, expect a hotly contested battle. Looking forward to this one.
The obvious match of the day, men: Lleyton Hewitt vs. Del Potro. Who the hell do you pick here? Hewitt is playing great, finding his game, and Del Potro is equally playing up to his highly anticipated promise. This could easily be an intriguing quarter-final match up, but we'll get to enjoy week #1.
Jelena Dokic lost and I feel for her. Talk about tough luck after the Aussi Open. She has struggled to win matches since, and when her game comes around at the French, she has to bow out mid-match against Elena.D, while sticking it to her. She'll be back...
Take a bow Marat Safin, you got whipped today, but your career has been so much fun to watch. It's a shame the Russian is leaving the game, with perhaps some time off, some re-focussing, and re-tooling, you have to think the Russian could still beat up on the elite (every now and again).

Enjoy the Tennis!
MarkOskar

Wimbledon 2009: Week 1 Interesting Match-ups

2009-06-20T08:54:00.004-04:00

Wimbledon is gearing up to begin and we have seeds, draws, and anticipation (building).
Let's walk-through some interesting potential match-ups on the ladies side of the draw during the 1st week.

1) Safina vs. Vaidisova - 2nd round - What the heck happened to Vaidisova? She has certainly not fulfilled her potential, and has dropped completely out of any spotlight. This still makes for an interesting bout though. Let's hope Nicole puts up a good fight
2) V.Williams vs. Kenepi - 3rd round - If this materializes, we could have some bruising tennis out there. Should be a fun shoot 'em up match.
3) Dokic vs. Malek/Stosur/Ivanovic - 1st/2nd/3rd round - I'm just noting this to keep Dokic in our minds. While no one is really expecting Jelena to pull out magic, it's when no one expects it, when that sort of stuff happens. Good luck to her!
4) Maria Sharapova vs. The Field - She's in the 3rd quarter of the draw and the 24th seed. Her results have been encouraging since coming back, and you know she'll be fighting out there...You'll hear it.
5) Jie Zheng vs. Serena Williams - 3rd round - Expect a fight from Jie, she made 4th round at the Aussi Open earlier this year, and while we should expect a Williams victory, it could be interesting.

Other people to watch:
Elena Dementieva - The Russian appears to have one of the easier quarters of the draw and could slip through quite easily here in 2009.

Vera Znonareva - Also in Elena's quarter, the only expected obstacle here could be the semi-hot playing Aleksandra Wozniak of Canada.

Ana Ivanovic - Will bow out to V.Williams, not making it out of her quarter.

Jelena Jankovic - Should face Williams in week #2, unless she crashes out, like she seems to do so well these days.

Nadal Quotes: 2009 Wimbledon Pull-Out

2009-06-19T17:19:00.003-04:00

"I’m here and I'm just not 100%. I'm better than what I was a couple of weeks ago but I don’t feel right,"
(TTNA - Suck it up)

"To not play Wimbledon is one of the toughest decisions of my career."
(TTNA - And a poor decision)

"I tried everything. I didn't feel terrible but also not close to my best. When I enter a tournament my goal is winning and my feeling right now is I'm not ready to win."
(TTNA - It doesn't feel terrible? So you are 70-80% and you pull?)

"It's very painful for me but I can't play at the tournament this year. It's tough but it is what it is."
(TTNA - No comment)

"I played with some problems on the knee for the last few months. I've been making efforts to play week after week. The truth is that sportsmen always play with pain and don't know where the limit is, where you can get to. I think I reached that limit now."
(TTNA - So it doesn't feel terrible, and according to previous comment, you feel better than a couple of weeks ago....BUT you are at your limit?)

MarkOskar

Rafael Nadal is Out of Wimbledon

2009-06-19T16:56:00.004-04:00

This is a pile of crap. Excuse my harshness here.

Rafael Nadal has withdrawn from defending his 2008 Wimbledon title due to a knee injury. After his loss in an exhibition the other day, Nadal clearly was leaning toward not playing, however I think none of us truly expected the Spaniard to throw in the 2009 towel.

I for one am pissed off.
Nadal - "When I start a tournament like Wimbledon, it is to try to win, and my feeling right now is I’m not ready to play to win."

This reminds me of the character Abraham from Chariots of Fire - "If I can't win, I won't run". His wife responds - "If you don't run, you can't win."
This moment in the movie was to signify the low point in his running career.

Believe me, I have had surgery on my right knee, and still haven't repaired a partially torn ACL. I know knee problems. I also know about toughing it out not playing 100%. You lower your head, take the pain, and suck it up.

Nadal isn't just some guy out there, he's the defending champion. If there is ANY time this guy has to tough it out, now is that time. This blog is the least of his media worries, I expect him to take some heat on this...Although we can surely expect some of the main streamers to play lame here.

I'm entirely disapointed in Nadal, and I absolutely 100% think less of him because of this decision.

Other points to consider:
1) What the hell is he doing playing exhibitions at this point?
2) While there are mandatory tournaments, it's up to Nadal to manage his playing schedule, this includes all non-atp sanctioned events
3) This is as lame-duck as withdrawing mid-match, finals with a non-critical injury.

This is a sad sad story.

MarkOskar.

2009 Wimbledon Seed Report: Men

2009-06-17T20:27:00.004-04:00

No surprise that Nadal will be the #1 seed at Wimbledon should the lad play. There hasn't been any notable updates on his situation lately, however I think we can expect Rafa to give it a go and see how things play out. What if Nadal doesn't make the finals here though? Will the knee be his excuse? He did after all note that he wouldn't attend Wimbledon if he wasn't 100%+(?).

I note this because the #2 seed, Roger Federer is clearly riding a renewed wave of confidence, and many/most are picking him as the man to beat. I agree with this entirely. Somehow this is Roger's tournament again, injured Nadal or not. With the French in his back pocket he will be going for the ultimate prize here, Grand Slam #15 and into the record books. I'm curious to see if he brings any celebrity onlookers should be make the finals in 2009.

Andy Murray, the Scotsman who should be making every British tabloid paper in the coming weeks is seeded #3, and should be a no-brainer into week #2, and certainly into the quarterfinals. That is where it gets tricky though, depending on how the draw is built, there is a strong contingent of players that will create a buzz of super matches during the 2nd week.

Djokovic holds the #4 seed, however he just took it in a tune-up, and is on a low after the French Open. His Aussi Open last year is all he has of note for some time, and I feel that one of the other kids could take him out here (depending on how the draw plays out). On the other hand, no one should question his talent. He did almost take Nadal out on clay just before the French and still is one dangerous dude.

With Del Potro sitting at #5, this is where the next generation can lay their bets. He is a slick giant out there and he should at the very least, live up to his seeding. This is your top-5 dark horse though. Break-out for Del Potro? I'm bull on this kid whatever the surface, he's due to make something happen.

The American Andy Roddick is at #6. Although a lower elite seed, there is plenty of pressure for him to make some tracks in the name of American tennis. With a serve that goes "boom", it's hard to bet against a decent run here, but I just don't see anything beyond quarters, whatever the draw holds.

Beyond Roddick you have a cast of players that make you say "meh" (Robredo), young-guns (Tsonga), and the curious - Soderling and Safin.

Yep, Safin was vaulted into the #15 seed position and this being his last Wimbledon, I will be certainly pulling for the Russian to create a bit of magic out there.

Soderling? Who knows what we'll get out of him here. Yeah, at the French, against Nadal, he looked like an unstoppable world-beater, but he fizzled against Federer. Who show's up at Wimbledon? What side of the draw will he be on? How fun would a Nadal-Soderling Re-match be on Center Court?...That's a re-match of the French, and of course a re-match of their epic battle previously at Wimbledon.

The draw will be posted in only a couple of days and qualifying will be completed shortly. The anticipation builds and dreams begin unfolding.

Enjoy the week everyone!
MarkOskar

Murray, Haas, Blake, and Djokovic Add to Wimledon Fun

2009-06-16T07:13:00.002-04:00

Sans the “Big 2”, Nadal and Federer, the week behind actually turned out to be quite an interesting one!

Who needs Nadal, when we have Murray? And who needs The Mighty Fed when we have Haas? No no, I’m kidding, in one weeks time, their presence will be welcomed with very open arms.

But with the 31 year old Haas taking a title by stunning Djokovic, and Murray beating a surprisingly well-tuned Blake, things get more interesting, yet again!

Djokovic now will head into Wimbledon on what I think is still a bad loss. Blake who has struggled all season long, and until this week was dipping in the rankings, shows us what he’s capable of doing. While Murray feeds that Briton appetite desperate for one of their own to win Wimbledon. No Briton had won Queens in over 70 years! 70 years!!
Well done Andy of Scotland. Well done.

How about this Haas kid though? 31 years old, still oozing of talent and desire, pulls won out to be the oldest winner of the tour season. It’s probably a safe bet that you won’t be seeing Haas taking any slams going forward, but it is always great to see the old(er) dogs on tour grinding it out and taking it in the name of “experience”. He played well at the French, and appears to be building on things.

It’s a shame that Haas had to struggle through countless shoulder surgeries and other injuries over his career. He’s one of these players that really does have the right stuff to have been a career top-5 player. Crowds love him (Standing-O this week), and his game doesn’t induce a yawn-fest.

Blake’s finals showing at Queens adds to that 2nd-tier of depth at Wimbledon which will make week 1 be that much more interesting. Wherever he is positioned on the draw, you can bet higher seeds will want to avoid him. I have always liked Blake, but I’ve never (yet) believed him to be a top-3 player. Solid strokes, sometimes impatient, though sometimes lets others dictate. He’s got great court presence though, and anytime he’s deep in the draw, it’s only good for tennis.

Wimbledon 2009 should be an interesting affair with storylines draped across every quarter of the draw. From Blake to Safin, to Del Potro, Murray and even Soderling and Mr.Roddick. I don’t even have to mention the Federer-Nadal show, but I just did.

Get to the local food store folks and pick up your strawberries, Wimbledon is right around the corner.

MarkOskar

Marat Safin & The Last Stand at Wimbledon

2009-06-12T18:45:00.003-04:00

The enigma that is Marat Safin is officially entering the home stretch and twilight of his complex, but entertaining career.

The 2-time Slam champion, former #1, will play Wimbledon one more time, and his final stroke on the lawns will be a sad moment. The big Russian has been a fan favorite over the years, producing strokes of genius, and an undeniable talent that rivals the greatest of greats.

What Safin lacked though was a mental fortitude equal to his physical talents.
It is a shame to see someone who was capable of beating anyone on any day, bow out of the game with so few accolades. But what Marat missed in tournament wins, he more than made up for with entertaining court presence, and post-match interviews.
Still 1 U.S Open (2000), and 1 Aussi Open (2005) is pretty solid.

Marat could make a crowd gasp with a tirade, or racquet smashing episode, or laugh uncontrollably with some exchange with fans, linesmen, or ump. He could ham it up better than anyone out there (that includes the Djokovic). Why? Because he was real. His emotions were real. He didn’t play to the crowd because he wanted to make fans, he acted based on instinct and true emotion.

We see those emotions in his little sister Danira Safina. Those emotions are the families worst enemy, and also best friend. Danira had it hard during the French Open final. Enormous pressure was resting on her shoulders, and she suffered from it. She will undoubtedly win her Slam in the near future though, and make a more formal claim to her #1 ranking.

Back to Marat though.

He currently resides in the upper top-20’s and probably will remain there until he rides off into the night. So many of us though find him in the major draw, circle his name, and watch quietly with anticipation to see if he can bring about his master game. If Goran can, why can’t Marat? He’s been the ultimate dark horse for several years now, and I would personally love to see his final Wimbledon be a strong showing.

The likely outcome however will be a loss somewhere in the 2nd to 4th rounds, but that won't cast any kind of shadow on a fantastic career that brought smiles to thousands and cast fear even in The Mighty Fed.

Good luck to Marat in all his future endeavors. May he continue kissing net judges at local club courts for years to come.

MarkOskar

Note: For more information on Marat's career - Wikipedia summary here.

Rained Out Tennis: You Cannot Be Serious

2009-06-11T20:29:00.003-04:00

Forget the professionals, today is about me!

So I've been watching the weather online all day knowing that there is threatening weather in the Toronto area. This evening I was supposed to be playing my 7:00pm Inter-County Tennis league doubles match against those bums from a suburb just north of Toronto.

The weather network has noted a 60% chance of rain all day for the area, and finally at about 3pm the skies opened up slightly with a consistent drizzle.

Am I playing? Is it going to be called a rain-out?

I look at traffic cams north of Toronto to see if the roads look wet, I check go check other weather reports for a 2nd, and 3rd opinion. All are now showing drizzle happening for the area, and on and off showers for the entire evening.

Surely it's canceled I think to myself.

But no! I get a message on the Blackberry stating that the courts are O.k. up north and matches are going to be on! Voila! There we go, tennis is on.

Now if you know the Toronto area, getting out of the city during rush hour is pretty much as bad as it gets in North America. The 401/DVP intersect is apparently the busiest highway juncture in North America. I decide to be "smart" and take Yonge Street straight up out of Toronto and into the area I'm playing. Brilliant I think to myself. 40Km north, and I'll be there in about an hour.

After I pull out of the underground garage on Bay Street, I immediately encounter gridlock and think, I'm screwed. I pull west over a street and decide University to Avenue route may be quicker...Wrong again. I weave my way north and finally make it to North York, about 60% of the way there, when rain begins pouring down on the car.

It's only temporary I think to myself, and continue onward, glancing at the Blackberry for messages of cancellation. None. At this point, it's about 6:45pm and I am still quite a ways. I know where the bottlenecks occur, and there were at least 3 more to weave through before a few Km's of open road to the courts.

Rain is still pouring as I reach the suburb and at this point it's past 7pm. I still haven't received a call, or an email. Why? Can the courts really be dry? Is there an alternate indoor site?

I finally make it to the courts 7:20 (I got on the road at 5:30) and see a few people standing around the absolutely soaking courts. The team captain is there also gazing down at the puddles. "Hey, what's the story here?" I ask, despite the fact that we are obviously not playing tonight. "It's rained out man, I tried calling you but I think I have your old cell phone #". A little back and forth and we discover that his cell has a "1" instead of a "9" to end my digits. @#$%@!!!

I waste no time to get out of there as the drive home is yet another 40-50Km from my home. No tennis, wasted gas, getting home late, and in a bad mood.

There are several lessons to be had on tonight's events.
1) Double check to make sure your Captain has your right contact information (and vice versa)
2) Take matter into your own hands and call the tennis club yourself
3) Avoid the Doubles league, team sports are for losers ;)

MarkOskar

Nadal Hopeful for Wimbledon

2009-06-09T14:43:00.003-04:00

"I am going to give my 200 percent to be ready for the most important tournament in the world," stated Nadal. "I will not go out and play, especially on the Wimbledon Center Court, if I am not 100 percent ready to play."

Although I think he meant well here, is Nadal saying that he wouldn't play Wimbledon if say, 95% ready to play? That would be a bit lame-duck, no?

I'm sure it wasn't meant in that manner, and we all certainly wish Nadal a speedy recovery from pain in those knees. What would Wimbledon be without the #1 player in the world and the defending champion?

Everyone knows that we are on a collision course to watch Federer-Nadal III, and I for won can't wait for the All-England Club to open its doors and start the action.

Let's hope Nadal is fit to play, and carries his ranking.

MarkOskar

Roger Federer - Tiger Woods Debate Heats Up

2009-06-09T07:02:00.006-04:00

With 14 Majors a piece and each with potentially no end in sight here, Tiger Woods and Roger Federer are dominating their respective sports like no others have in the past.

Sure, Woods hasn't (yet) surpassed Jack's major haul, however it would be a shock if this didn't happen within the next 5 years for certain. Roger of course, just tied Sampras with 14 majors and Wimbledon is already within sights. For Woods, the U.S. Open is only a couple of weeks away, and he is the favorite.

Contained within message boards, blogs, and commercial websites, the battle rages on though. Who is the most dominate athlete? Who has a greater grip on their respective sports?...But what the arguments posted really come down to, is which sport is more difficult to achieve nirvana in.

I've played both tennis and golf competitively and these are the only two sports I know from truly a competitive perspective. Both require heavy doses of mental fortitude, and both require very very, finely tuned mechanical control of body.

While I feel tempted to, I'm not going to post what I believe is the answer to this debate...But what I will do is acknowledge that this can only be a good...No, make that a great debate for the popularity of tennis.

Associating Roger Federer with Tiger Woods, the most popular and most recognizable athlete on the planet is huge for Roger, and for tennis. We aren't back in the 1980's when tennis was wildly popular in North America, and (tennis) U.S Opens enjoyed by even the most lazyest of armchair quarterbacks. Tennis needs to take what it can get. Nike should also be taking what it can get, and while the Woods narrated Federer commercial is gold (posted on previous post), surely Nike can do more to capitalize on this very cool relationship of stars.

If Roger can pass Tiger in majors, I would really love to see a role reversal with the commercial and enjoy Federer narrating on Woods, with the comical ending that is again, pure gold.

I think the debate of who is more dominant, and who is the greater athlete is absolutely pointless, however the "press" on it is only a good thing for Roger, Tennis and Golf included. Great leaders are everywhere in sports, but the truly special ones only come around so often. Tiger and The Mighty Fed, are just those special great ones.

Enjoy them both while you can folks.

MarkOskar